IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i9-10p1380-1393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of an instrument to assess knowledge and skills of evidence‐based nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Mee Ock Gu
  • Yeongmi Ha
  • Jeongsook Kim

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop an objective instrument to measure nurses' entry‐level knowledge of and skills in evidence‐based practice, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the instrument. Background To promote evidence‐based practice in nursing, nurses should initially receive education about evidence‐based practice knowledge and learn the skills, and this should be followed by measurement with an instrument that was developed to evaluate the extent to which they are prepared to use evidence‐based practice knowledge and skills. Although some self‐report instruments have been developed to measure evidence‐based practice in nursing, an objective instrument to evaluate nurses' evidence‐based practice knowledge and skills is not available at present. Design A methodological study. Methods This study was conducted in two stages: the instrument development and its psychometric evaluation, including its validity and reliability. An instrument, ‘Knowledge and Skills of Evidence‐based Nursing,’ was developed. Content validity was assessed by five experts in evidence‐based nursing, and the construct validity was evaluated by the known‐groups method. Reliability was examined with internal consistency reliability and inter‐rater reliability. Results A content validity index >0·80 was achieved. For construct validity, there were statistically significant differences between the evidence‐based practice and nonevidence‐based practice groups in total scores and in the scores on each subscale of the Knowledge and Skills of Evidence‐based Nursing. Cronbach's alpha was 0·96, and the inter‐rater reliability was excellent. Conclusions The Knowledge and Skills of Evidence‐based Nursing is a valid and reliable instrument for objectively assessing nurses' evidence‐based practice knowledge and skills; it is quick to complete and to score the answers. Relevance to clinical practice Because the Knowledge and Skills of Evidence‐based Nursing objectively assesses nurses' evidence‐based practice knowledge and skills, it can be used to examine the effects of evidence‐based practice education. Moreover, the Knowledge and Skills of Evidence‐based Nursing may contribute to the promotion of evidence‐based practice projects in clinical settings because it can measure the extent to which nurses are prepared to use their evidence‐based practice knowledge and skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Mee Ock Gu & Yeongmi Ha & Jeongsook Kim, 2015. "Development and validation of an instrument to assess knowledge and skills of evidence‐based nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(9-10), pages 1380-1393, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:9-10:p:1380-1393
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12754
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:9-10:p:1380-1393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.