IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i5-6p778-785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in the handover process and perception between nurses and residents in a critical care setting

Author

Listed:
  • Amartya Mukhopadhyay
  • Benjamin SH Leong
  • Adela Lua
  • Rana Aroos
  • Jie Jun Wong
  • Nicola Koh
  • Nicholette Goh
  • Kay Choong See
  • Jason Phua
  • Yanika Kowitlawakul

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify the differences in practices and perceptions of handovers between nurses and residents in the critical care setting, so as to improve the quality of the process. Background Critically ill patients with complex problems are ideal for the study of handovers. However, few handover studies have been conducted in intensive care units. Design Descriptive study using questionnaires. Methods We interviewed all nurses and residents involved in handovers of patients admitted to and discharged from a medical intensive care unit over a period of one month. Interviews were guided by a questionnaire and conducted between 24–48 hours of handovers. Results Out of 672 eligible participants, 580 (290 nurses and 290 residents) agreed to participate in the study (86·3% response rate). Compared to residents, nurses received more training on handovers, covered issues specific to allied health specialties more frequently during handovers, and reviewed patients earlier after handovers. The perceived importance of the different components of handover varied significantly: donor residents, donor nurses, recipient residents and recipient nurses emphasised the overall management plan, case complexity, management plan over the next 48 hours and past medical history, including allergies, respectively. Satisfaction in the handover was related to pre‐handover review of electronic medical records, handover training and clarity level in the management plan following the handover, with only the last factor remaining significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions More nurses than residents received prior training in handovers. Nursing handovers were more inclusive of allied health specialties. The perceived importance of the components of handover varied. Greater clarity in management plans was associated with better satisfaction. Relevance to clinical practice Deficiencies in the handover process (lack of prior training in handovers, not including allied health specialties and not reviewing electronic records before handover) were identified, thus providing opportunities for mutual learning between nurses and residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Amartya Mukhopadhyay & Benjamin SH Leong & Adela Lua & Rana Aroos & Jie Jun Wong & Nicola Koh & Nicholette Goh & Kay Choong See & Jason Phua & Yanika Kowitlawakul, 2015. "Differences in the handover process and perception between nurses and residents in a critical care setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 778-785, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:5-6:p:778-785
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12707
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:5-6:p:778-785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.