IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i5-6p728-738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisation, practice and experiences of mouth hygiene in stroke unit care: a mixed‐methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Horne
  • Giles McCracken
  • Angus Walls
  • Pippa J Tyrrell
  • Craig J Smith

Abstract

Aims and objectives To (1) investigate the organisation, provision and practice of oral care in typical UK stroke units; (2) explore stroke survivors', carers' and healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions about the barriers and facilitators to receiving and undertaking oral care in stroke units. Background Cerebrovascular disease and oral health are major global health concerns. Little is known about the provision, challenges and practice of oral care in the stroke unit setting, and there are currently no evidence‐based practice guidelines. Design Cross‐sectional survey of 11 stroke units across Greater Manchester and descriptive qualitative study using focus groups and semi‐structured interviews. Methods A self‐report questionnaire was used to survey 11 stroke units in Greater Manchester. Data were then collected through two focus groups (n = 10) with healthcare professionals and five semi‐structured interviews with stroke survivors and carers. Focus group and interview data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using framework approach. Results Eleven stroke units in Greater Manchester responded to the survey. Stroke survivors and carers identified a lack of oral care practice and enablement by healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals identified a lack of formal training to conduct oral care for stroke patients, inconsistency in the delivery of oral care and no set protocols or use of formal oral assessment tools. Conclusion Oral care post‐stroke could be improved by increasing healthcare professionals' awareness, understanding and knowledge of the potential health benefits of oral care post‐stroke. Further research is required to develop and evaluate the provision of oral care in stroke care to inform evidence‐based education and practice. Relevance to clinical practice Development of staff training and education, and evidence‐based oral care protocols may potentially benefit patient care and outcomes and be implemented widely across stroke care.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Horne & Giles McCracken & Angus Walls & Pippa J Tyrrell & Craig J Smith, 2015. "Organisation, practice and experiences of mouth hygiene in stroke unit care: a mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 728-738, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:5-6:p:728-738
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shilpi Ajwani & Sumedh Jayanti & Nadia Burkolter & Craig Anderson & Sameer Bhole & Rhonda Itaoui & Ajesh George, 2017. "Integrated oral health care for stroke patients – a scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 891-901, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:5-6:p:728-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.