IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i3-4p486-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Australian clinical practice outcome standards for graduates of critical care nurse education

Author

Listed:
  • Fenella J Gill
  • Gavin D Leslie
  • Carol Grech
  • Duncan Boldy
  • Jos M Latour

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop critical care nurse education practice standards. Background Critical care specialist education for registered nurses in Australia is provided at graduate level. Considerable variation exists across courses with no framework to guide practice outcomes or evidence supporting the level of qualification. Design An eDelphi technique involved the iterative process of a national expert panel responding to three survey rounds. Methods For the first round, 84 statements, organised within six domains, were developed from earlier phases of the study that included a literature review, analysis of critical care courses and input from health consumers. The panel, which represented the perspectives of four stakeholder groups, responded to two rating scales: level of importance and level of practice. Results Of 105 experts who agreed to participate, 92 (88%) completed survey round I; 85 (92%) round II; and 73 (86%) round III. Of the 98 statements, 75 were rated as having a high level of importance – median 7 (IQR 6–7); 14 were rated as having a moderate level of importance – median 6 (IQR 5–7); and nine were rated as having a low level of importance – median 4 (IQR 4–6)–6 (IQR 4–6). The majority of the panel rated graduate level of practice as ‘demonstrates independently’ or ‘teaches or supervises others’ for 80 statements. For 18 statements, there was no category selected by 50% or more of the panel. The process resulted in the development of 98 practice standards, categorised into three levels, indicating a practice outcome level by the practitioner who can independently provide nursing care for a variety of critically ill patients in most contexts, using a patient‐ and family‐focused approach. Conclusion/relevance to clinical practice The graduate practice outcomes provide a critical care qualification definition for nursing workforce standards and can be used by course providers to achieve consistent practice outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenella J Gill & Gavin D Leslie & Carol Grech & Duncan Boldy & Jos M Latour, 2015. "Development of Australian clinical practice outcome standards for graduates of critical care nurse education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 486-499, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:486-499
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:3-4:p:486-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.