IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i23-24p3700-3706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical assessment techniques performed by Italian registered nurses: a quantitative survey

Author

Listed:
  • Giancarlo Cicolini
  • Marco Tomietto
  • Valentina Simonetti
  • Dania Comparcini
  • Maria Elena Flacco
  • Maicol Carvello
  • Lamberto Manzoli

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aims of the study were to describe which of the core techniques of the physical assessment are regularly performed by a sample of Italian nurses, and to investigate the potential predictors of a more complete examination. Background Physical examination is among the essential tasks of nursing professionals, who are requested to perform a correct and complete physical assessment. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Methods The study was performed between August 2013 and January 2014 in 17 Italian regions. A total of 1182 questionnaires were collected. Results Most participants were females (age range 41–50 years), and worked in Internal Medicine, Intensive Care and Surgical hospital units. Of the 30 core techniques that are currently taught and performed according to the Italian Baccalaureate degree requirements, 20 were routinely performed, 6 were seldom used and 4 were learnt but almost never performed (auscultation of lung, heart and bowel sounds and spine inspection). Graduate and postgraduate nurses, working in Intensive Care Units and Nursing Homes, were more prone than the others to carry out a more complete physical assessment. Conclusions The skills to perform a physical assessment are suboptimal among this sample of Italian nurses. Health and educational providers should pose more attention and efforts to provide nurses with an acceptable training in physical examination practice. Relevance to clinical practice This study describes the specific physical techniques performed by nurses in real practice and provides information on which skills require more attention in nursing educational programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Giancarlo Cicolini & Marco Tomietto & Valentina Simonetti & Dania Comparcini & Maria Elena Flacco & Maicol Carvello & Lamberto Manzoli, 2015. "Physical assessment techniques performed by Italian registered nurses: a quantitative survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3700-3706, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3700-3706
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12997
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evelyn McElhinney, 2010. "Factors which influence nurse practitioners ability to carry out physical examination skills in the clinical area after a degree level module – an electronic Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3177-3187, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virpi Maijala & Kerttu Tossavainen & Hannele Turunen, 2015. "Identifying nurse practitioners' required case management competencies in health promotion practice in municipal public primary health care. A two‐stage modified Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2554-2561, September.
    2. Maria A Mendes & Diná ALM da Cruz & Margareth Angelo, 2015. "Clinical role of the nurse: concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 318-331, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3700-3706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.