IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i23-24p3605-3614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for returning to the emergency department following discharge from an internal medicine unit: perspectives of patients and the liaison nurse clinician

Author

Listed:
  • Molywan Vat
  • Carol Common
  • Andrea Maria Laizner
  • Coralie Borduas
  • Christine Maheu

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the patients' reasons for returning to the emergency department soon after their discharge from an internal medicine unit and to compare these reasons with the liaison nurse clinician's risk assessment tools used for discharge planning. Background Returns to the emergency departments soon after discharge from the hospital are a recurrent problem. Factors precipitating readmission to hospital have been analysed through the lens of health care providers, but few studies have explored the patients' perspectives on their reasons for returning to the emergency departments. Design A qualitative, descriptive study. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of eight patients recruited from a major teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada. Three different data sources were triangulated: patients' perspectives obtained through interviews and data from the tools used by the liaison nurse clinician, the Bounceback Probability Legend and the LACE Index Scoring Tool. Results Most patients attributed their return to the emergency department on being discharged too soon, feeling weak at discharge, having limited help at home with managing chronic illnesses and insufficient discharge instructions. participants' reasons for returning differed from those predicted by the liaison nurse clinician's evaluation using the risk assessment tools of each participant's risk of return. Conclusions This study highlights patients' frailty upon discharge from the hospital and their informational need on their health condition and their support need to rely on during convalescence at home. Patient's readiness and concerns were not integrated as part of the liaison nurse clinician's evaluation tools for discharge planning. This led to discrepancies between the perspectives of the patients and the liaison nurse clinician about discharge planning. Relevance to clinical practice Health care professionals should evaluate patients' understanding of their illness, their readiness for self‐management and work collaboratively with patients to assess concerns before discharge, so that appropriate support can be mobilised to prevent readmission.

Suggested Citation

  • Molywan Vat & Carol Common & Andrea Maria Laizner & Coralie Borduas & Christine Maheu, 2015. "Reasons for returning to the emergency department following discharge from an internal medicine unit: perspectives of patients and the liaison nurse clinician," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3605-3614, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3605-3614
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:23-24:p:3605-3614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.