IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i17-18p2538-2544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric performance of the English language six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory in an acute care context

Author

Listed:
  • David Edvardsson
  • Anne‐Marie Mahoney
  • Juanita Hardy
  • Tony McGillion
  • Anne McLean
  • Frances Pearce
  • Kathryn Salamone
  • Elizabeth Watt

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric performance of the six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory in a sample of Australian acute hospital inpatients. Background Caring is significant for nursing, and exploring the prevalence of staff‐caring behaviours is imperative for high‐quality acute care. There is a need for psychometrically sound scales that measures caring in acute care, without imposing extensive respondent burden. Design A cross‐sectional survey design was used to distribute the six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory to an Australian sample of hospital inpatients (n = 210) in December 2012. Method Psychometric evaluation included item performance, construct validity and internal consistency reliability. Results The six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory had satisfactory psychometric performance as evidenced by normally distributed scores, a uni‐dimensional structure explaining 65% of variance in data, a total Cronbach's α of 0·89 and corrected item‐total correlations between 0·51–0·82. Conclusion The six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory had satisfactory estimates of validity and reliability when tested in an Australian sample of acute hospital inpatients. The tool contributes to the literature by being a brief and nonburdensome alternative with seemingly strong psychometric properties to be used in future measures of caring in nursing. Relevance to clinical practice The six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory provides a psychometrically tested fundament for reflective clinical discussions on how nurse behaviours facilitate or impede patient experiences of caring. This can benefit quality development in clinical practice as being in tune with patient experiences and expectations is fundamental to high quality services and patient satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • David Edvardsson & Anne‐Marie Mahoney & Juanita Hardy & Tony McGillion & Anne McLean & Frances Pearce & Kathryn Salamone & Elizabeth Watt, 2015. "Psychometric performance of the English language six‐item Caring Behaviours Inventory in an acute care context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2538-2544, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2538-2544
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12849
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:17-18:p:2538-2544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.