IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i15-16p2295-2304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transitions in the communication experiences of tracheostomised patients in intensive care: a qualitative descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Stine Irene Flinterud
  • Birgitta Andershed

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe how tracheostomised patients in intensive care experience acts of communication and to better understand their experiences in the context of the transitions theory. Background Waking up in an intensive care unit unable to speak because of mechanical ventilation can be challenging. Communication aids are available, but patients still report difficulties communicating. Investigating how mechanically ventilated patients experience communication in the context of the transitions theory might elucidate new ways of supporting them during their transitions while being ventilated. Design A qualitative, descriptive design. Methods Eleven patients who had previously been tracheostomised in an intensive care unit were included in this quality improvement project conducted in a university hospital in Norway. Participants were tracheostomised from 3–27 days. Semistructured interviews were conducted from June 2013–August 2013, 3–18 months after hospital discharge. Transcripts were analysed using inductive content analysis. Results Participants reported a great diversity of emotions and experiences attempting to communicate while being tracheostomised. One overarching theme emerging from the analysis was the ‘Experience of caring and understanding despite having uncomfortable feelings due to troublesome communication.’ The theme consists of three categories. The category ‘Emotionally challenging’ shows that patients struggled initially. With time, their coping improved, as revealed in the category ‘The experience changes with time.’ Despite difficulties, participants described positive experiences, as shown in the category ‘Successful communication.’ Conclusion The importance of patients experiencing caring and understanding despite their difficult situation constitutes the core finding. The findings suggest that participants went through different transitions. Some reached the end of their transition, experiencing increased stability. Relevance to clinical practice Despite challenges with communication, participants reported that caring and safety provided by health care professionals were significant experiences. They viewed nonverbal communication as being very important.

Suggested Citation

  • Stine Irene Flinterud & Birgitta Andershed, 2015. "Transitions in the communication experiences of tracheostomised patients in intensive care: a qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2295-2304, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2295-2304
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12826
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marte‐Marie Wallander Karlsen & Kristin Heggdal & Arnstein Finset & Lena Güntenberg Heyn, 2019. "Attention‐seeking actions by patients on mechanical ventilation in intensive care units: A phenomenological‐hermeneutical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 66-79, January.
    2. Ronny Enger & Birgitta Andershed, 2018. "Nurses’ experience of the transfer of ICU patients to general wards: A great responsibility and a huge challenge," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 186-194, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2295-2304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.