Author
Listed:
- Chris Quinn
- Brenda Happell
Abstract
Aims and objectives To explore perceptions of privacy and dignity for sexual relationships in a Forensic mental health hospital. Background The role of nurses in forensic mental health hospitals is frequently complicated by opposing expectations of therapeutic relationships and maintaining security. What can result is an over‐emphasis on risk reduction by controlling patient behaviour, which can extend to patient intimacy and sexual relationships. Design An exploratory, qualitative approach. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with 12 nurses and 10 patients in a forensic mental health hospital. Thematic data analysis was undertaken to identify the main themes. Results The need for a private and dignified place for patient intimacy was one major theme to emerge from this research from both nurse and patient participants and is the focus of this article. A disparity is reported between the level of support reported by nurse participants with the experience of the patient participants. Conclusions Sexual intimacy and sexual relationships are important components of normal human behaviour. Institutional rules and rule adherence create barriers for patients, forcing their intimacy and sexual relationships into secrecy. There is a need for further research to consider the benefits and risks of patient intimacy and sexual relationships for long‐term patients in forensic mental health settings. Relevance to clinical practice Patients in forensic hospitals are sexually active and seek support from nurses. Nurses are in an ideal role to recognise the important part they can play in supporting the intimacy and sexual relationship needs of patients. Strategies to assist in developing confidence in responding to normal human behaviour is a matter of priority.
Suggested Citation
Chris Quinn & Brenda Happell, 2015.
"Sex on show. Issues of privacy and dignity in a Forensic mental health hospital: Nurse and patient views,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2268-2276, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2268-2276
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12860
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2268-2276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.