Author
Listed:
- Neel S Iyer
- Jeannette R Koziel
- Melissa L Langhan
Abstract
Aims and Objectives We explored perceptions about capnography for procedural sedation and barriers to use in a paediatric emergency department. Background Capnography is a sensitive monitor of ventilation and is increasingly being studied in procedural sedation. While benefits have been found, it has not gained wide acceptance for monitoring of children during sedation. Design A qualitative exploratory study was performed. Methods Using a grounded theory approach, physicians and nurses from the paediatric emergency department participated in one‐on‐one interviews about their experiences with and opinions of capnography. An iterative process of data collection and analysis was used to inductively generate theories and themes until theoretical saturation was achieved. Results Five physicians and 12 nurses were interviewed. Themes included: Experiences: Participants felt that procedural sedation is safe and adverse events are rare. Normal capnography readings reassured providers about the adequacy of ventilation. Knowledge: Despite experience with capnography, knowledge and comfort varied. Most participants requested additional education and training. Diffusion of Use: While participants expressed positive opinions about capnography, use for sedation was infrequent. Many participants felt that capnography use increased in other paediatric populations, such as patients with altered mental status, ingestions or head trauma. Barriers: Identified barriers to use included a lack of comfort with or knowledge about equipment, lack of availability of the monitor and cannulas, lack of inclusion of these supplies on a checklist for procedural sedation preparedness, and lack of a policy for use of capnography during sedation. Conclusion Capnography use during sedation in the paediatric emergency department is limited despite positive experiences and opinions about this device. Addressing modifiable barriers such as instrument availability, continuing education, and inclusion on a checklist may increase use of capnography during sedation. Relevance to clinical practice Despite the perceived benefits, a broad implementation plan is required to introduce capnography successfully to the paediatric emergency department.
Suggested Citation
Neel S Iyer & Jeannette R Koziel & Melissa L Langhan, 2015.
"A qualitative evaluation of capnography use in paediatric sedation: perceptions, practice and barriers,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2231-2238, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2231-2238
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12848
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2231-2238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.