IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i15-16p2201-2210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health value & perceived control over health: behavioural constructs to support Type 2 diabetes self‐management in clinical practice

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Elizabeth Nugent
  • Maggie Carson
  • Nicola Naomi Zammitt
  • Graeme Drummond Smith
  • Kenneth A Wallston

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore health value and perceived control over health in relation to self‐management behaviours in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Background Helping people to modify health related behaviour in diabetes is complex due to a multitude of factors. Exploring the meaning of the constructs of Modified Social Learning Theory could be beneficial to identifying people at risk of poor diabetes self‐management. Design An exploratory qualitative study. Methods Thirteen adults with insulin‐treated Type 2 diabetes mellitus were purposively sampled. Data were collected through semi‐structured interviews. An in‐depth thematic analysis was carried out. Results Health became a value priority on diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Participants described holding both terminal (relating to desired end states) and instrumental (a means to an end) health values pre‐diagnosis but these became instrumental post‐diagnosis to meet new lifestyle needs and maintain their quality of life. Descriptions of ‘conflicts’ in locus of control beliefs when managing Type 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrated influences on levels of self‐efficacy and health value. Common themes that impacted on diabetes self‐management included co‐morbidities, medication management, blood glucose monitoring and reasoning for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Conclusions Locus of control beliefs, levels of self‐efficacy and health value were influenced by complications associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The findings on Modified Social Learning Theory and instrumental health value as a moderator to health behaviour resulted in the development of a proposed framework with potential practical utility. Relevance to clinical practice This research demonstrates the relevance of exploring the constructs of Modified Social Learning Theory (MSLT) in relation to diabetes self‐management behaviours in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The proposed Type 2 diabetes mellitus Self‐management Behaviour Support framework incorporates Modified Social Learning Theory and instrumental health value as the theoretical basis for development and could provide clinical nurses and doctors with a tool that will allow for in‐depth assessment and planning of Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients' self‐management behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Elizabeth Nugent & Maggie Carson & Nicola Naomi Zammitt & Graeme Drummond Smith & Kenneth A Wallston, 2015. "Health value & perceived control over health: behavioural constructs to support Type 2 diabetes self‐management in clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2201-2210, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2201-2210
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2201-2210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.