IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i15-16p2143-2151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of psychosocial problems in children with type 1 diabetes and their families: the added value of using standardised questionnaires in addition to clinical estimations of nurses and paediatricians

Author

Listed:
  • Emiel A Boogerd
  • Anouk MA Damhuis
  • Janiëlle (A)AEM van Alfen‐van der Velden
  • Marley CCH Steeghs
  • Cees Noordam
  • Chris M Verhaak
  • Ignace PR Vermaes

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the assessment of psychosocial problems in children with type 1 diabetes by means of clinical estimations made by nurses and paediatricians and by using standardised questionnaires. Background Although children with type 1 diabetes and their parents show increased risk for psychosocial problems, standardised assessment of these problems lacks in diabetes care. Design By comparing these different modes of assessment, using a cross‐sectional design, information about the additional value of using standardised questionnaires is provided. Methods Participants were 110 children with type 1 diabetes (aged 4–16), their parents, and healthcare professionals. Children filled out the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Diabetes Module. Parents filled out the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire parent‐report and the Parenting Stress Index. Independently, nurses and paediatricians filled out a short questionnaire, which assessed their clinical estimations of the children's psychosocial problems and quality of life, and parents' levels of parenting stress. Reports of children and parents were compared to clinical estimations. Results Children in our sample showed more psychosocial problems and lower health‐related quality of life than their healthy peers. In approximately half of the children, dichotomous estimations by healthcare professionals and dichotomised reports by patients and parents were in agreement. In 10% of the children, no psychosocial problems were present according to professionals' estimations, although patients and parents‐reported psychosocial problems. In 40%, psychosocial problems were present according to professionals' estimations, although parents and patients did not report psychosocial problems. Conclusion Children with type 1 diabetes show more psychosocial problems than healthy children. Professionals seem to tend towards overestimating psychosocial problems. Relevance to clinical practice Extending the assessment of psychosocial problems with routine screening on patient‐reported outcomes, using validated questionnaires, could be of additional value in tailoring care to the needs of the individual child and parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Emiel A Boogerd & Anouk MA Damhuis & Janiëlle (A)AEM van Alfen‐van der Velden & Marley CCH Steeghs & Cees Noordam & Chris M Verhaak & Ignace PR Vermaes, 2015. "Assessment of psychosocial problems in children with type 1 diabetes and their families: the added value of using standardised questionnaires in addition to clinical estimations of nurses and paediatr," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2143-2151, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2143-2151
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12789
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:15-16:p:2143-2151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.