IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i13-14p1895-1903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Severity and duration of pain after colonoscopy and gastroscopy: a cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Penny Allen
  • Elissa Shaw
  • Anne Jong
  • Heidi Behrens
  • Isabelle Skinner

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to determine the prevalence, severity, location and duration of pain post‐colonoscopy, and to explore possible associations between pain, demographic variables and diagnostic findings. The study also sought to provide information to guide decision‐making on CO2 insufflation. Background Colonoscopy with sedation is a common day surgery procedure in Australia. Attendance for colonoscopy is influenced by patient expectations, particularly about pain. Research on post‐colonoscopy pain has focussed on pain experienced immediately post‐procedure, with few studies investigating pain beyond 24 hours. Design Follow‐up study using patient‐completed Pain Numerical Rating Scales. Methods Patients undergoing colonoscopy at a single hospital day surgery unit were invited to complete Pain Numerical Rating Scales (where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain) three times daily for three days post‐colonoscopy. Results Among the 277 participants, 124 (45%) reported pain at any time during follow‐up. Twenty‐one (8%) participants experienced pain on each of the three days. Pain was most commonly experienced in the hypogastric and iliac regions. The severity of pain was low, with only 33 participants self‐administering analgesics (paracetamol or nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs) during follow‐up. Participants who had both colonoscopy and gastroscopy were not more likely to report pain overall. However, they were more likely to report pain on days 2 and 3 and were also more likely to take analgesics. Pain was not associated with procedure duration, abdominal pressurisation, removal of polyps, diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease or the presence of benign or malignant lesions. Conclusions This research indicates that fewer than half of the patients undergoing colonoscopy will experience post‐procedure pain and that just over one in ten patients will require analgesics. Patients undergoing both gastroscopy and colonoscopy are more likely to experience pain for longer and require over‐the‐counter analgesics. The low prevalence of pain suggests that room air insufflation is an acceptable alternative to more expensive CO2. Relevance to clinical practice The findings provide evidence for nurses and clinicians to advise patients about the likelihood of experiencing pain post‐colonoscopy, and the characteristics of this pain. Nurses may reassure patients that pain is not more likely among patients diagnosed with colorectal disease or malignancy. Patients who have persistent pain for longer than 24 hours post‐colonoscopy should be advised to seek medical care to investigate the cause of their pain.

Suggested Citation

  • Penny Allen & Elissa Shaw & Anne Jong & Heidi Behrens & Isabelle Skinner, 2015. "Severity and duration of pain after colonoscopy and gastroscopy: a cohort study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1895-1903, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:13-14:p:1895-1903
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12817
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:13-14:p:1895-1903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.