IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i11-12p1718-1729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Involving patients in understanding hospital infection control using visual methods

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Wyer
  • Debra Jackson
  • Rick Iedema
  • Su‐Yin Hor
  • Gwendolyn L Gilbert
  • Christine Jorm
  • Claire Hooker
  • Matthew Vincent Neil O'Sullivan
  • Katherine Carroll

Abstract

Aims and Objectives This paper explores patients' perspectives on infection prevention and control. Background Healthcare‐associated infections are the most frequent adverse event experienced by patients. Reduction strategies have predominantly addressed front‐line clinicians' practices; patients' roles have been less explored. Design Video‐reflexive ethnography. Methods Fieldwork undertaken at a large metropolitan hospital in Australia involved 300 hours of ethnographic observations, including 11 hours of video footage. This paper focuses on eight occasions, where video footage was shown back to patients in one‐on‐one reflexive sessions. Findings Viewing and discussing video footage of clinical care enabled patients to become articulate about infection risks, and to identify their own roles in reducing transmission. Barriers to detailed understandings of preventative practices and their roles included lack of conversation between patients and clinicians about infection prevention and control, and being ignored or contradicted when challenging perceived suboptimal practice. It became evident that to compensate for clinicians' lack of engagement around infection control, participants had developed a range of strategies, of variable effectiveness, to protect themselves and others. Finally, the reflexive process engendered closer scrutiny and a more critical attitude to infection control that increased patients' sense of agency. Conclusion This study found that patients actively contribute to their own safety. Their success, however, depends on the quality of patient–provider relationships and conversations. Rather than treating patients as passive recipients of infection control practices, clinicians can support and engage with patients' contributions towards achieving safer care. Relevance to clinical practice This study suggests that if clinicians seek to reduce infection rates, they must start to consider patients as active contributors to infection control. Clinicians can engage patients in conversations about practices and pay attention to patient feedback about infection risk. This will broaden clinicians' understandings of infection control risks and behaviours, and assist them to support appropriate patient self‐care behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Wyer & Debra Jackson & Rick Iedema & Su‐Yin Hor & Gwendolyn L Gilbert & Christine Jorm & Claire Hooker & Matthew Vincent Neil O'Sullivan & Katherine Carroll, 2015. "Involving patients in understanding hospital infection control using visual methods," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1718-1729, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:11-12:p:1718-1729
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12779
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Wyer & Rick Iedema & Su‐Yin Hor, 2014. "Editorial: Patients: passive subjects or active participants in reducing the spread of infection?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2385-2386, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hooker, Claire & Hor, Suyin & Wyer, Mary & Gilbert, Gwendolyn L. & Jorm, Christine & Iedema, Rick, 2020. "Trajectories of hospital infection control: Using non-representational theory to understand and improve infection prevention and control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Mamdooh Alzyood & Debra Jackson & Joanne Brooke & Helen Aveyard, 2018. "An integrative review exploring the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals towards patient involvement in promoting hand hygiene compliance in the hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1329-1345, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:11-12:p:1718-1729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.