IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i11-12p1643-1655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of a hospital‐based education programme on self‐care behaviour, care dependency and quality of life in patients with heart failure – a randomised controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Köberich
  • Christa Lohrmann
  • Oskar Mittag
  • Theo Dassen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the effects of a nurse‐led, hospital‐based heart failure specific education session with a three‐month telephone follow‐up on self‐care behaviour, care dependency and quality of life for patients with chronic heart failure. Background Patient education in patients with heart failure is able to promote heart failure‐specific self‐care, to reduce mortality, morbidity and rehospitalisation rates and to enhance quality of life, especially if heart failure education is embedded in a multidisciplinary approach. Evidence of the effect of a nurse‐led self‐care education, quality of life and care dependency in addition to standard medical treatment in Germany is lacking. Design Nonblinded, prospective, single‐centre, randomised controlled trial. Method Sixty‐four patients were allocated either to the intervention group or to the control group. Patients in the intervention group received education about heart failure self‐care with a consecutive telephone follow‐up over three months in addition to standard medical treatment. Patients in the control group received standard medical treatment only. Results Data of 110 patients (58 in the intervention group and 52 in the control group) with a mean age of 62 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 28·2% could be analysed. Self‐care education had a significant influence on overall heart failure self‐care but not on quality of life and care dependency. Conclusion A single education session with a consecutive telephone follow‐up is able to improve overall self‐care behaviours but not quality of life. Care dependency was not influenced by the education session. Relevance to clinical practice The easy to implement and short educational intervention has a positive effect on self‐care behaviour for patients with heart failure. However, there was no effect on quality of life and care dependency. To improve quality of life and to influence care dependency, different measures have to be applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Köberich & Christa Lohrmann & Oskar Mittag & Theo Dassen, 2015. "Effects of a hospital‐based education programme on self‐care behaviour, care dependency and quality of life in patients with heart failure – a randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1643-1655, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:11-12:p:1643-1655
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12766
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bettina Højberg Kirk & Ole De Backer & Malene Missel, 2019. "Transforming the experience of aortic valve disease in older patients: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1233-1241, April.
    2. Shangping Zhao & Hong Chen, 2019. "Effectiveness of health education by telephone follow‐up on self‐efficacy among discharged patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomised control trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3840-3847, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:11-12:p:1643-1655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.