IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i11-12p1466-1478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and ability to communicate the risks and benefits of complementary and alternative medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiao‐Yun Chang
  • Huai‐Lu Chang

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study reviewed existing literature to investigate how frequently nurses include complementary and alternative forms of medicine in their clinical practice. In so doing, we investigated nurses' knowledge of and attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine as well as their ability to communicate the risks and benefits of these therapies with patients. Background Little information is available concerning nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine or how they incorporate these therapies into their practice. In addition, little is known about the ability of nurses to communicate the risks and benefits of complementary and alternative medicine to their patients. Study design This study used a scoping review method to map and synthesise existing literature. Data sources Both electronic and manual searches were used to identify relevant studies published between January 2007 and January 2014. Review methods The review was conducted in five stages: (1) identification of research question(s), (2) locate studies, (3) selection of studies, (4) charting of data, and (5) collating, summarising, and reporting of results. Results Fifteen papers met the inclusion criteria for this review, among which 53·7% referenced how frequently nurses include complementary and alternative medicine in their practice. We found that 66·4% of nurses had positive attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine; however, 77·4% did not possess a comprehensive understanding of the associated risks and benefits. In addition, nearly half of the respondents (47·3–67·7%) reported feeling uncomfortable discussing complementary and alternative medicine therapies with their patients. Conclusion The lack of knowledge about complementary and alternative medicine among nurses is a cause for concern, particularly in light of its widespread application. Relevance to clinical practice Findings from this study suggest that health care professionals need to promote evidence informed decision‐making in complementary and alternative medicine practice and be knowledgeable enough to discuss complementary and alternative medicine therapies. Without involvement of complementary and alternative medicine communication on the part of our profession, we may put our patients at risk of uninformed and without medical guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiao‐Yun Chang & Huai‐Lu Chang, 2015. "A review of nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and ability to communicate the risks and benefits of complementary and alternative medicine," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1466-1478, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:11-12:p:1466-1478
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12790
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:11-12:p:1466-1478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.