IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i1-2p275-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient experience in the emergency department: inconsistencies in the ethic and duty of care

Author

Listed:
  • Cheryle Moss
  • Katherine Nelson
  • Margaret Connor
  • Cynthia Wensley
  • Eileen McKinlay
  • Amohia Boulton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand how people who present on multiple occasions to the emergency department experience their health professionals' moral comportment (ethic of care and duty of care); and to understand the consequences of this for ‘people who present on multiple occasions’ ongoing choices in care. Background People (n = 34) with chronic illness who had multiple presentations were interviewed about the role that emergency departments played within their lives and health–illness journey. Unprompted, all participants shared views about the appropriateness or inappropriateness of the care they received from the health professionals in the emergency departments they had attended. These responses raised the imperative for specific analysis of the data regarding the need for and experience of an ethic of care. Design Qualitative description of interview data (stage 3 of a multimethod study). Methods The methods included further analysis of existing interviews, exploration of relevant literature, use of Tronto's ethic of care as a theoretical framework for analysis, thematic analysis of people who present on multiple occasions' texts and explication of health professionals' moral positions in relation to present on multiple occasions' experiences. Results Four moral comportment positions attributed by the people who present on multiple occasions to the health professionals in emergency department were identified: ‘sustained and enmeshed ethic and duty of care’, ‘consistent duty of care’, ‘interrupted or mixed duty and ethic of care’, and ‘care in breach of both the ethic and duty of care’. Conclusions People who present on multiple occasions are an important group of consumers who attend the emergency department. Tronto's phases/moral elements in an ethic of care are useful as a framework for coding qualitative texts. Investigation into the bases, outcomes and contextual circumstances that stimulate the different modes of moral comportment is needed. Relevance to clinical practice Findings carry implications for emergency department care of people who present on multiple occasions and for emergency department health professionals to increase awareness of their moral comportment in care.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheryle Moss & Katherine Nelson & Margaret Connor & Cynthia Wensley & Eileen McKinlay & Amohia Boulton, 2015. "Patient experience in the emergency department: inconsistencies in the ethic and duty of care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 275-288, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:275-288
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12612
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:275-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.