IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i1-2p151-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A description of nurses' decision‐making in managing electrocardiographic monitor alarms

Author

Listed:
  • Priscilla K Gazarian
  • Natalie Carrier
  • Rachel Cohen
  • Haley Schram
  • Samara Shiromani

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the cues and factors that nurses use in their decision‐making when responding to clinical alarms. Background Alarms are designed to be very sensitive, and as a result, they are not very specific. Lack of adherence to the practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings has been observed, resulting in overuse of the electrocardiographic monitoring. Monitoring without consideration of clinical indicators uses scarce healthcare resources and may even produce untoward circumstances because of alarm fatigue. With so many false alarms, alarm fatigue represents a symptom of a larger problem. It cannot be fixed until all of the factors that contribute to its existence have been examined. Design This was a qualitative descriptive study. Method This study was conducted at an academic medical centre located in the Northeast United States. Eight participants were enrolled using purposive sampling. Nurses were observed for two three‐hour periods. Following each observation, the nurse was interviewed using the critical decision method to describe the cognitive processes related to the alarm activities. Qualitative data from the conducted interviews were analysed via an a priori framework founded in the critical decision method. Results This study reveals information, experience, guidance and decision‐making as the four prominent categories contributing to nurses' decision‐making in relation to alarm management. Managing technology was a category not identified a priori that emerged in the data analysis. Conclusion Nurses revealed a breadth of information needed to adequately identify and interpret monitor alarms, and how they used that information to put the alarms into the particular context of an individual patient's situations. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding the cues and factors nurses use when responding to cardiac alarms will guide the development of learning experiences and inform policies to guide practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Priscilla K Gazarian & Natalie Carrier & Rachel Cohen & Haley Schram & Samara Shiromani, 2015. "A description of nurses' decision‐making in managing electrocardiographic monitor alarms," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 151-159, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:151-159
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12625
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halley Ruppel & Marjorie Funk & Robin Whittemore & Shu‐Fen Wung & Christopher P. Bonafide & Holly Powell Kennedy, 2019. "Critical care nurses’ clinical reasoning about physiologic monitor alarm customisation: An interpretive descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3033-3041, August.
    2. Geraldine Crilly & Maura Dowling & Isabelle Delaunois & Mary Flavin & Linda Biesty, 2019. "Critical care nurses' experiences of providing care for adults in a highly technological environment: A qualitative evidence synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4250-4263, December.
    3. Jiasi Bi & Xin Yin & Hongyan Li & Ruitong Gao & Qing Zhang & Tangsheng Zhong & Tao Zan & Baoxing Guan & Zhen Li, 2020. "Effects of monitor alarm management training on nurses’ alarm fatigue: A randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4203-4216, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:151-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.