IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i9-10p1445-1458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How virtual admission affects coping – telemedicine for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Emme
  • Susan Rydahl‐Hansen
  • Birte Østergaard
  • Lone Schou
  • Anna Svarre Jakobsen
  • Klaus Phanareth

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe what characterises chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' coping of physical, emotional and social problems before, during and after virtual admission, in interaction with health professionals and relatives. Background Telemedicine for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is gaining ground. However, virtual admission using telemedicine in the patients' home as a replacement of hospital admission has received little attention. Furthermore, little is known about how telemedicine affects chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' coping. Design Grounded Theory study using semi‐structured interviews. MethodsThe study was a part of The Virtual Hospital study, exploring virtual admission for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During virtual admission, patients had access to medical equipment consisting of monitoring devices, medication, nebuliser and a touch screen with built‐in videoconference system. Nine participants were interviewed after virtual admission. Open coding, axial coding and selective coding, using constant comparative analysis, were conducted. ResultsA substantive Grounded Theory was developed, containing the core category – struggling to be in control of life with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – related to four categories: complete powerlessness, dependency, pursuit of regaining autonomy and efforts to remain in control of problems related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Virtual admission supported participants' autonomy. The involvement of health professionals was reduced as participants used the medical equipment to cope with disease‐related problems. Participants' coping was closely linked to the presence of the equipment, making it difficult for them to apply their experiences after discharge from virtual admission. Conclusions Virtual admission may support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' coping of physical and emotional problems. However, coping experiences made during virtual admission may not be directly applicable outside a telemedical setting. Relevance to clinical practice Telemedicine may result in different roles for patients, relatives and health professionals. Clinicians should consider how they can support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' coping during telemedical interventions, focusing on how to ensure a sustained improvement that patients can benefit from outside the telemedical setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Emme & Susan Rydahl‐Hansen & Birte Østergaard & Lone Schou & Anna Svarre Jakobsen & Klaus Phanareth, 2014. "How virtual admission affects coping – telemedicine for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1445-1458, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1445-1458
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12444
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1445-1458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.