IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i9-10p1403-1410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Situation awareness and documentation of changes that affect patient outcomes in progress notes

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Tower
  • Wendy Chaboyer

Abstract

Aims and objectives To report on registered nurses’ situation awareness as a precursor to decision‐making when recording changes in patients’ conditions. Background Progress notes are important to communicate patients’ progress and detail changes in patients’ conditions. However, documentation is often poorly completed. There is little work that examines nurses’ decision‐making during documentation. This study focused on describing situation awareness as a precursor to decision‐making during documentation. Design This study used Endsley's (Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ) work on situation awareness to guide and conceptualise information. The study was situated in a naturalistic paradigm to provide an interpretation of nurses’ decision‐making. Methods Think‐aloud research methods and semi‐structured interviews were employed to illuminate decision‐making processes. Audio recordings and interview texts were individually examined for evidence of cues, informed by Endsley's (Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ) descriptions of situation awareness. Results As patients’ conditions changed, nurses used complex mental models and pattern‐matching of information, drawing on all 3 levels of situation awareness during documentation. Level 1 situation awareness provided context, level 2 situation awareness signified a change in condition and its significance for the patient, and level 3 situation awareness was evident when nurses thought aloud about what this information indicated. Three themes associated with changes in patients’ conditions emerged: deterioration in condition, not responding to prescribed treatments as expected and issues related to professional practice that impacted on patients’ conditions. Conclusion Nurses used a complex mental model for decision‐making, drawing on 3 levels of situation awareness. Hamm's cognitive continuum theory, when related to situation awareness, is a useful decision‐making theory to provide a platform on which to draw together components of situation awareness and provide a framework on which to base decision‐making regarding documentation. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding how RNs employ situation awareness and providing a framework for decision‐making during documentation may assist effective documentation about changes in patients’ conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Tower & Wendy Chaboyer, 2014. "Situation awareness and documentation of changes that affect patient outcomes in progress notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1403-1410, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1403-1410
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1403-1410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.