IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i9-10p1300-1308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of recently bereaved people's beliefs about death: implications for bereavement care

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Draper
  • Margaret Holloway
  • Susan Adamson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the beliefs of recently bereaved people about death and to explore the implications of these beliefs for bereavement care. Background Little is known about recently bereaved people's beliefs about death, although there is evidence that these beliefs may have an impact on health. The funeral provides an opportunity for bereaved people to reflect on their beliefs about death. Design A qualitative approach. Methods This paper describes one aspect of an interdisciplinary study of the spirituality of contemporary funerals. We obtained access to 46 funerals through funeral directors and other contacts, and interviewed principal mourners to explore their beliefs. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results Three themes emerged that reflected the beliefs and experiences of bereaved people. The first theme describes people's understanding of death in terms of five positions: religious, dualist, eco‐spiritualist, materialist and death‐as‐transition. The second theme addresses a range of views about the possibility of life after death: resurrection, reuniting and reincarnation. The third theme describes ways in which people felt that their relationship with the deceased person continues after death: continuity as sense of presence and continuity as memory, legacy and love. Some people were reluctant to express a firm view about death. Conclusions People express a spectrum of beliefs about death. Their beliefs are infrequently linked to formal religious or spiritual perspectives but seem to have an important role in coping with bereavement. Relevance to clinical practice This is a unique study illustrating the complexity of bereaved people's beliefs about death. The study provides a research‐based framework within which to understand contemporary beliefs about death, and contributes to our understanding of how health professionals can support recently bereaved people.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Draper & Margaret Holloway & Susan Adamson, 2014. "A qualitative study of recently bereaved people's beliefs about death: implications for bereavement care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1300-1308, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1300-1308
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12326
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carl B. Becker & Yozo Taniyama & Noriko Sasaki & Megumi Kondo-Arita & Shinya Yamada & Kayoko Yamamoto, 2022. "Mourners’ Dissatisfaction with Funerals May Influence Their Subsequent Medical/Welfare Expenses—A Nationwide Survey in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:9-10:p:1300-1308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.