IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i7-8p976-984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric properties of the self‐efficacy for clinical evaluation scale in Turkish nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Neriman Zengin
  • Rukiye Pınar
  • Ayse Cil Akinci
  • Hicran Yildiz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine psychometric properties of the Self‐Efficacy for Clinical Evaluation Scale (SECS) in a nursing student sample. Background Self‐efficacy is a good choice to be used in order to make a prediction of nursing students' performance in clinical practice. The SECS, consisting of perceived self‐efficacy and importance subscales, seems to be suitable to evaluate self‐efficacy regarding care skills for patients with chronic diseases. However, there is not a valid tool to evaluate the perception of self‐efficacy for Turkish nursing students. Design Cross‐sectional methodological design. Methods The sample included 400 Turkish nursing students who attended practicum at a hospital. Content of the SECS was evaluated by content validity index (CVI). Reliability was evaluated with internal consistency, item–total correlation and test–retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and convergent and divergent validity were used to test the validity. Results The CVI results were satisfactory. We found satisfactory evidence for internal consistency and item–total correlations. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed stability of subscales. The CFA replicated two‐factor structure for the SECS. This was reflected in all fit indices. All factor loadings were positive and were above the perfect level. The convergent validity was supported by the correlation between SECS and General Self‐Efficacy Scale. The divergent validity findings demonstrated that SECS differentiated between students with various levels of general point average, which is an indicator of academic success. Conclusion In conclusion, SECS is a reliable and valid tool used in clinical nursing education settings. Relevance to clinical practice Measuring students' self‐efficacy in a clinical environment can provide an insight for students into what they have learned. Nurse educators can also use the SECS to spot nursing students with weaknesses in care activities and create educational strategies to help them to enhance their academic performance. Using the SECS can yield an insight both for students and for nursing educators.

Suggested Citation

  • Neriman Zengin & Rukiye Pınar & Ayse Cil Akinci & Hicran Yildiz, 2014. "Psychometric properties of the self‐efficacy for clinical evaluation scale in Turkish nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 976-984, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:976-984
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12257
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:976-984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.