IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i7-8p1064-1075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja McIlfatrick
  • Felicity Hasson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate a holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice. This included identifying patients' needs using the holistic tool and exploring the usability, applicability and barriers and facilitators towards implementation in practice. Background The delivery of effective holistic palliative care requires a careful assessment of the patients' needs and circumstances. Whilst holistic assessment of palliative care needs is advocated, questions exist around the appropriateness of tools to assist this process. Design Mixed‐method research design. Methods Data collection involved an analysis of piloted holistic assessments undertaken using the tool (n = 132) and two focus groups with healthcare professionals (n = 10). Results The tool enabled health professionals to identify and gain an understanding of the needs of the patients, specifically in relation to the physical healthcare needs. Differences, however, between the analysis of the tool documentation and focus group responses were identified in particular areas. For example, 59 (68·8%) respondents had discussed preferred priorities of care with the patient; however, focus group comments revealed participants had concerns around this. Similarly, whilst over half of responses (n = 50; 57·5%) had considered a prognostic clinical indicator for the patient as an action, focus group results indicated questions around healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceived usefulness of such indicators. Positive aspects of the tool were that it was easy to understand and captured the needs of individuals. Negative aspects of the tool were that it was repetitive and the experience of assessors required consideration. Conclusion The tool evaluation identified questions regarding holistic assessment in palliative care practice and the importance of communication. Relevance to clinical practice A holistic assessment tool can support patient assessment and identification of patients' needs in the ‘real world’ of palliative care practice, but the ‘tool' is merely an aid to assist professionals to discuss difficult and sensitive aspects of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja McIlfatrick & Felicity Hasson, 2014. "Evaluating an holistic assessment tool for palliative care practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1064-1075, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:1064-1075
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12320
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonja McIlfatrick & Michael Connolly & Rita Collins & Tara Murphy & Bridget Johnston & Philip Larkin, 2017. "Evaluating a dignity care intervention for palliative care in the community setting: community nurses’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4300-4312, December.
    2. Camilla A Mousing & Helle Timm & Kirsten Lomborg & Marit Kirkevold, 2018. "Barriers to palliative care in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in home care: A qualitative study of the perspective of professional caregivers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 650-660, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:1064-1075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.