IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i5-6p865-876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mixed‐method study exploring suffering and alleviation in participants attending a chronic pain management programme

Author

Listed:
  • Elin Dysvik
  • Jan Terje Kvaløy
  • Bodil Furnes

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and describe the suffering of patients that arises from chronic pain, and the alleviation of this suffering within a chronic pain management programme. In this mixed‐method study, we examined how quantitative findings can be integrated to answer a complex research question and expand qualitative findings. Background Suffering and grief often follow chronic pain and can involve a number of experiences. Therefore, understanding and explaining the chronic pain experience must incorporate subjective experiences and phenomenological dimensions. Design A qualitatively driven multiple mixed‐method design. The qualitative core was supplemented with three quantitative sequential components and integrated after analyses in a result narrative. Methods Thirty‐four consecutive outpatients were recruited to an eight‐week pain management programme that was founded on cognitive behavioural therapy. The qualitative core component consisted of asking the participants about their experiences of the programme after the completion and again after six months. Two quantitative questionnaires, measuring living with pain and grief and loss were administered at pretest, post‐test and six‐month follow‐up. Satisfaction with the programme was measured after its completion. Results Both the qualitative reports and the quantitative data showed that the programme had been valuable and alleviated the participants' suffering. The written reports described the importance of group processes, increased self‐understanding and other aspects that were meaningful to the participants. The quantitative data provided additional information about what and how the programme had been important to the participants. Conclusions The findings clearly indicate that suffering can be alleviated by attending such programme as several key shifts in perspectives took place, and allowed them to move towards a better life. Relevance to clinical practice By attending such programme, patients may learn about cognitive and behavioural factors that contribute to chronic pain and suffering and how alleviation is possible through change of focus and active involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Elin Dysvik & Jan Terje Kvaløy & Bodil Furnes, 2014. "A mixed‐method study exploring suffering and alleviation in participants attending a chronic pain management programme," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5-6), pages 865-876, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:865-876
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12270
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caryn West & Petra Buettner & Lee Stewart & Kim Foster & Kim Usher, 2012. "Resilience in families with a member with chronic pain: a mixed methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3532-3545, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:5-6:p:865-876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.