IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3525-3532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian practice nursing: collaboration in context

Author

Listed:
  • Eamon Merrick
  • Margaret Fry
  • Christine Duffield

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore whether or not the context of Australian practice nursing supports collaborative decision‐making about organisation and delivery of patient care. Background Positive patient outcomes depend on Australian practice nurses participating in collaborative and interprofessional services, particularly for patients with chronic disease(s). It is unclear whether Australian practice nurses have the opportunity to collaborate in decision‐making or how traditional organisational structures may support or hinder collaboration. Design This is a descriptive exploratory study. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted using a purposive sample of practice nurses (n = 15). Thematic analysis was used to provide meaningful and contextual insights into how practice nurses participate in decision‐making. Method An interview tool, based on available literature, was developed and consisted of thirty open‐ended questions to direct discussion during telephone interviews. Transcribed data were imported into NVivotm for analysis and interpretation. The collection, analysis and thematic interpretation of data were an iterative process. Findings Participants fostered trusting interprofessional relationships, which enabled them to influence medical decision‐making and thereby advocate for patient need. Trusting interprofessional relationships were perceived to alter the relative roles of the medical practitioner and practice nurse and enhance the opportunities for collaborative decision‐making. Conclusions and relevance to clinical practice Collaborative interprofessional care in Australian general practice must occur if increased demands for care are to be met. It is timely to consider how government policy, financial regulations and the organisation of Australian general practice can better support and enhance a collaborative contribution to care by practice nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Eamon Merrick & Margaret Fry & Christine Duffield, 2014. "Australian practice nursing: collaboration in context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3525-3532, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3525-3532
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12605
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eileen Boyle & Rosemary Saunders & Vicki Drury, 2016. "A qualitative study of patient experiences of Type 2 Diabetes care delivered comparatively by General Practice Nurses and Medical Practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 1977-1986, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3525-3532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.