IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3366-3377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for middle‐aged women in Taiwan to choose hysterectomy: a qualitative study using the bounded rationality perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Shu‐Mei Wu
  • Hui‐Ling Lee
  • Mei‐Yu Yeh
  • Hui‐Lian Che

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore women's perspectives on deciding to undergo hysterectomy for benign conditions based on physicians' recommendations and the women's own judgement. Background Hysterectomy is the second most common surgical procedure worldwide. Although most hysterectomies are elective, physicians may recommend treatment that involves a loss of sexuality or ovary removal, creating a difficult choice for women. Design Qualitative, in‐depth interview Methods A purposive sample of 17 women was recruited. The women had decided to undergo hysterectomy after the diagnosis of uterine fibroids. All these women had already decided not to have more children. Data were collected by in‐depth interviewing, and content analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Our study revealed five themes: release from stress, inescapable fate, positive support, hoping for peace of mind and sense of trust. Conclusions The participants felt that mental and physical health were the most important considerations, noting that when women no longer want children, a uterus is useless. The women believed that they retained their womanhood, even without a uterus, and were satisfied with the outcomes of their hysterectomy decisions. Relevance to clinical practice Our findings might serve as educational and counselling reference materials for healthcare providers, ensuring that women receive appropriate care quality and have their needs met. Healthcare providers can then maximise women's empowerment, deepen their awareness of body image and their concept of self‐care and help them to clearly perceive their own concerns and needs so that they can make suitable decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu‐Mei Wu & Hui‐Ling Lee & Mei‐Yu Yeh & Hui‐Lian Che, 2014. "Reasons for middle‐aged women in Taiwan to choose hysterectomy: a qualitative study using the bounded rationality perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3366-3377, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3366-3377
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12580
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei‐Ling Lin & Mei‐Che S Pang & Ching‐Huey Chen, 2013. "Family as a whole: elective surgery patients’ perception of the meaning of family involvement in decision making," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1-2), pages 271-278, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bridget Klest & Christina Mutschler & Andreea Tamaian, 2016. "Factors affecting surgery decision‐making in patients with a chronic neurovascular condition," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2430-2437, September.
    2. Mira Palonen & Marja Kaunonen & Päivi Åstedt‐Kurki, 2016. "Family involvement in emergency department discharge education for older people," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3333-3344, November.
    3. Tsui‐Yun Yang & Hung‐Ru Lin, 2017. "Taking actions to quit chewing betel nuts and starting a new life: taxi drivers’ successful experiences of quitting betel nut chewing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 1031-1041, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3366-3377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.