IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i21-22p3124-3137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of virtual admission on self‐efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – a randomised clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Emme
  • Erik L Mortensen
  • Susan Rydahl‐Hansen
  • Birte Østergaard
  • Anna Svarre Jakobsen
  • Lone Schou
  • Klaus Phanareth

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate how virtual admission during acute exacerbation influences self‐efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, compared with conventional hospital admission. Background Telemedicine solutions have been highlighted as a possible way to increase self‐efficacy in patients with chronic diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, little is known about how telemedicine‐based virtual admission as a replacement of hospital admission during acute exacerbation affects chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' self‐efficacy. Design This study was a nonblinded, randomised clinical multicentre trial. The study was a substudy to The Virtual Hospital, investigating the feasibility and safety of telemedicine‐based treatment at home for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods Participants were consecutively randomised to virtual admission or conventional hospital admission. Data from 50 patients were analysed. Self‐efficacy was assessed at baseline, three days after discharge, and also six weeks and three months after discharge, using the Danish version of ‘The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self‐efficacy scale'. Results Intergroup comparison showed no significant differences between the two groups at baseline, three days after discharge, six weeks after discharge or three months after discharge. Furthermore, intragroup comparison did not reveal significant differences in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease self‐efficacy scale mean sum score within the two groups. Conclusions The results of the study suggest that there is no difference between self‐efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients undergoing virtual admission, compared with conventional hospital admission. However, the anticipated sample size could not be reached, which prompts caution regarding interpretation of the findings. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides new insight into how virtual admission affects chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' self‐efficacy. Clinicians should consider the timing, duration and the content in the design of telemedical interventions directed at improving chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients' self‐efficacy, as telemedicine solutions alone may not be sufficient to enhance self‐efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Emme & Erik L Mortensen & Susan Rydahl‐Hansen & Birte Østergaard & Anna Svarre Jakobsen & Lone Schou & Klaus Phanareth, 2014. "The impact of virtual admission on self‐efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – a randomised clinical trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3124-3137, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3124-3137
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12553
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3124-3137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.