IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i21-22p3115-3123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prehospital emergency care for patients with suspected hip fractures after falling – older patients' experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Aronsson
  • Ida Björkdahl
  • Birgitta Wireklint Sundström

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe and explain older patients' lived experiences of prehospital emergency care in cases of suspected hip fractures after falling. Background Falls among the elderly is an issue internationally and a public health problem that seems to be on the increase. In the emergency medical services, older people are frequent patients after having suffered a fall, but there is little information on how older patients experience prehospital emergency care in cases of suspected hip fractures after falling. Design Qualitative interview study. Methods Ten older patients were interviewed. These depth interviews were tape‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed for meanings. Results The comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon is: ‘Glad to have been rescued, despite bad experiences as well as good'. The older patient is offered care in an open and friendly atmosphere concurrently with feeling anxiety about the treatment. Intervention with streamlined care and treatment can thus simultaneously be beneficial as well as doing harm. Patients experience confusion and the need to ask questions about what really happened in the ambulance. Bad experiences remain unexplained. These findings are based on three themes with relevant subthemes: efficiency, concerned encounters and suffering from care. Conclusions Our study shows that prehospital emergency care when hip fracture is suspected – from patients' point of view – is insufficient and unsatisfying. Prehospital emergency care for these vulnerable patients could be improved through more compassion being shown towards older patients' existential needs and their increased participation. Furthermore, alternative methods of prehospital pain relief need to be developed. Relevance to clinical practice Responsibility for patients' safety regarding pain relief is emphasised. Pain relief in the emergency medical services should be individualised. This development should focus on care that is already good and gradually eradicate compassionless care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Aronsson & Ida Björkdahl & Birgitta Wireklint Sundström, 2014. "Prehospital emergency care for patients with suspected hip fractures after falling – older patients' experiences," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3115-3123, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3115-3123
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12550
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina Foss, 2011. "Elders and patient participation revisited – a discourse analytic approach to older persons’ reflections on patient participation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(13‐14), pages 2014-2022, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dagrunn N Dyrstad & Kristin A Laugaland & Marianne Storm, 2015. "An observational study of older patients’ participation in hospital admission and discharge – exploring patient and next of kin perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1693-1706, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3115-3123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.