IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i21-22p3107-3114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of swaddling and heel warming on pain response to heel stick in neonates: a randomised control trial

Author

Listed:
  • Shao‐Hui Shu
  • Ying‐Li Lee
  • Mark Hayter
  • Ruey‐Hsia Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the efficacy of swaddling and heel warming on pain response in neonates following heel stick. Background Swaddling has been suggested to reduce pain response in neonates during heel stick. Heel warming is also often performed for drawing blood easily before heel stick. However, the efficacy of both on pain response is unclear. Design A randomised controlled study was used. Methods Twenty‐five neonates were randomly assigned to each of the control, swaddling and heel‐warming groups. Heart rate, oxygen saturation Neonatal Infant Pain Scale and duration of crying were used to assess pain reactivity and pain recovery. A greater heart rate and Neonatal Infant Pain Scale increase, or oxygen saturation decrease, indicated higher pain reactivity. A longer duration of heart rate and oxygen saturation changes after heel stick back to baseline indicated a longer pain recovery. Results The decrease in oxygen saturation in swaddling group was significantly greater than that in heel‐warming group. The increase in the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale in control group was significantly higher than that in swaddling group. The heart rate recovery time in control group and swaddling group was significantly longer than that in heel‐warming group. The oxygen saturation recovery time in control group was significantly longer than that in heel‐warming group. The duration of crying in control group was significantly longer than those in swaddling group and heel‐warming group. Conclusion Both swaddling and heel warming decreased the pain response of neonates during heel stick. Heel warming resulted in a lower pain response than did swaddling for neonates, particularly in terms of pain recovery. Relevance to clinical practice Heel warming could become a routine practice to decrease the pain response of neonates during heel stick.

Suggested Citation

  • Shao‐Hui Shu & Ying‐Li Lee & Mark Hayter & Ruey‐Hsia Wang, 2014. "Efficacy of swaddling and heel warming on pain response to heel stick in neonates: a randomised control trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3107-3114, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3107-3114
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12549
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatma Yilmaz & Duygu Arikan, 2011. "The effects of various interventions to newborns on pain and duration of crying," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(7‐8), pages 1008-1017, April.
    2. Mei‐Fang Liu & Kuan‐Chia Lin & Yi‐Hung Chou & Tzu‐Ying Lee, 2010. "Using non‐nutritive sucking and oral glucose solution with neonates to relieve pain: a randomised controlled trial," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1604-1611, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3107-3114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.