IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i21-22p2998-3011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluative review of questionnaires recommended for the assessment of quality of life and symptom severity in women with urinary incontinence

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Hewison
  • Dorothy McCaughan
  • Ian Watt

Abstract

Aims and objectives To provide an up‐to‐date assessment of the quality of commonly recommended questionnaires for measuring symptom severity and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence and also to consider their application to practice. Background Urinary incontinence is a common problem for women. In addition to various physical symptoms, there is a known effect on quality of life. Psychometrically robust questionnaires are reported to be the best way to measure an individual's perceptions of symptom severity and quality of life, and a number of different ones are recommended for use in international and national guidance, which can be confusing for clinicians. Moreover, there are concerns over the applicability of some of these instruments in clinical practice. Design An evaluative review was carried out examining selected questionnaires measuring symptom severity and/or quality of life. Methods Selection of questionnaires for inclusion in the review was based on the recommendations of evidence‐based guidance, followed by systematic scrutiny of the characteristics of the individual recommended questionnaires. Results Thirteen questionnaires were included in the review, of which three appeared to ‘outperform’ the remainder in terms of their psychometric properties and other characteristics. Conclusions This review provides the most up‐to‐date and comprehensive analysis of the quality and applicability of the included questionnaires and offers the practitioner advice on which to select for use in practice. Relevance to clinical practice This review aims to help the practitioner choose a questionnaire based on a sound evaluation of the quality of the questionnaire and its applicability to the clinical setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Hewison & Dorothy McCaughan & Ian Watt, 2014. "An evaluative review of questionnaires recommended for the assessment of quality of life and symptom severity in women with urinary incontinence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 2998-3011, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:2998-3011
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12503
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:2998-3011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.