IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i19-20p2896-2908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The fulfilment of knowledge expectations during the perioperative period of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty – a Nordic perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Brynja Ingadottir
  • Åsa Johansson Stark
  • Helena Leino‐Kilpi
  • Arun K. Sigurdardottir
  • Kirsi Valkeapää
  • Mitra Unosson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the possible differences between knowledge expectations and received knowledge of patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty in Iceland, Sweden and Finland and also to determine the relationship between such a difference and both background factors and patient satisfaction with care. Background Knee arthroplasty is a fast‐growing and a successful treatment for patients with osteoarthritis. Patient education can improve surgery outcomes, but it remains unknown what knowledge patients expect to receive and actually acquire during the perioperative period and what factors are related to that experience. Design Descriptive, prospective survey. Methods In total, 290 patients answered questionnaires about their expectations (Knowledge Expectations of hospital patients ‐ scale) before surgery and about received knowledge (Received Knowledge of hospital patients ‐ scale) and satisfaction with hospital care (Patient Satisfaction Scale) at discharge. Sociodemographics, clinical information, accessibility to knowledge from healthcare providers (Access to Knowledge Scale), and preferences for information and behavioural control (Krantz Health Opinion Survey) were collected as background data. Results Patients' knowledge expectations were higher (mean 3·6, SD 0·4) than their perception of received knowledge (mean 3·0, SD 0·7). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that access to knowledge, information preferences and work experience within health‐ or social care explained 33% (R²) of the variation in the difference between received and expected knowledge. Patients reported high satisfaction with their care except regarding how their family was involved. Conclusion Patients undergoing knee arthroplasty receive less knowledge than they expect, and individual factors and communication with healthcare providers during hospitalisation are related to their experience. The content of patient education and family involvement should be considered in future care. Relevance to clinical practice The results strengthen the knowledge base on the educational needs of knee arthroplasty patients and can be used to develop and test new interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Brynja Ingadottir & Åsa Johansson Stark & Helena Leino‐Kilpi & Arun K. Sigurdardottir & Kirsi Valkeapää & Mitra Unosson, 2014. "The fulfilment of knowledge expectations during the perioperative period of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty – a Nordic perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2896-2908, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:19-20:p:2896-2908
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12552
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Åsa Johansson Stark & Andreas Charalambous & Natalja Istomina & Sanna Salanterä & Arun K Sigurdardottir & Panayota Sourtzi & Kirsi Valkeapää & Adelaida Zabalegui & Margareta Bachrach‐Lindström, 2016. "The quality of recovery on discharge from hospital, a comparison between patients undergoing hip and knee replacement – a European study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2489-2501, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:19-20:p:2896-2908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.