IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i17-18p2628-2636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the cut‐off point of osteoporosis based on the osteoporosis self‐assessment tool, body mass index and weight in Taiwanese young adult women

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Fang Chang
  • Rong Sen Yang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the cut‐off point of the osteoporosis self‐assessment tool, age, weight and body mass index for osteoporosis among young adult Taiwanese women, using a large‐scale health examination database containing bone mineral density tests. Background The cut‐off points of osteoporosis risk factors identified earlier focus on menopausal or senior Caucasian and Asian women. However, young adult Asian women have seldom been identified. Design A retrospective historical cohort study. Methods Using the 2009–2011 health examination database of a large‐scale medical centre in northern Taiwan, this study investigated young adult Asian women (i.e. range in age from 30–49 years) in Taiwan who had received dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry test. This study also explored the cut‐off point, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of receiver operating characteristics of osteoporosis among young adult females in Taiwan. Results This study collected 2454 young adult Asian women in Taiwan. Cochran–Armitage analysis results indicated that the prevalence of osteoporosis increased with decreasing weight, body mass index and osteoporosis self‐assessment method quartiles. According to the results of receiver operating characteristics, weight, body mass index and osteoporosis self‐assessment tool approaches can generally be used as indicators to predict osteoporosis among young adult Asian women. Conclusions Results of this study demonstrate that Taiwanese women contracting osteoporosis tend to be young and underweight, as well as having a low body mass index and osteoporosis self‐assessment scores. Those results further suggest that the assessment indicators for cut‐off points are appropriately suitable for young adult women in Taiwan. Relevance to clinical practice Early detection is the only available means of preventing osteoporosis. Professional nurses should apply convenient and accurate assessment procedures to help young adult women to adopt preventive strategies against osteoporosis early, thus eliminating the probability of osteoporotic fracture.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu Fang Chang & Rong Sen Yang, 2014. "Determining the cut‐off point of osteoporosis based on the osteoporosis self‐assessment tool, body mass index and weight in Taiwanese young adult women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2628-2636, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:17-18:p:2628-2636
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chien-Chang Chen & Cheng-Shyuan Rau & Shao-Chun Wu & Pao-Jen Kuo & Yi-Chun Chen & Hsiao-Yun Hsieh & Ching-Hua Hsieh, 2016. "Association of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Score with Clinical Presentation and Expenditure in Hospitalized Trauma Patients with Femoral Fractures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Cheng-Shyuan Rau & Pao-Jen Kuo & Shao-Chun Wu & Yi-Chun Chen & Hsiao-Yun Hsieh & Ching-Hua Hsieh, 2016. "Association between the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians Score and Mortality in Patients with Isolated Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:17-18:p:2628-2636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.