IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i17-18p2554-2564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A single‐item self‐report medication adherence question predicts hospitalisation and death in patients with heart failure

Author

Listed:
  • Jia‐Rong Wu
  • Darren A DeWalt
  • David W Baker
  • Dean Schillinger
  • Bernice Ruo
  • Kristen Bibbins‐Domingo
  • Aurelia Macabasco‐O'Connell
  • George M Holmes
  • Kimberly A Broucksou
  • Brian Erman
  • Victoria Hawk
  • Crystal W Cene
  • Christine DeLong Jones
  • Michael Pignone

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine whether a single‐item self‐report medication adherence question predicts hospitalisation and death in patients with heart failure. Background Poor medication adherence is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Having a simple means of identifying suboptimal medication adherence could help identify at‐risk patients for interventions. Design We performed a prospective cohort study in 592 participants with heart failure within a four‐site randomised trial. Methods Self‐report medication adherence was assessed at baseline using a single‐item question: ‘Over the past seven days, how many times did you miss a dose of any of your heart medication?’ Participants who reported no missing doses were defined as fully adherent, and those missing more than one dose were considered less than fully adherent. The primary outcome was combined all‐cause hospitalisation or death over one year and the secondary endpoint was heart failure hospitalisation. Outcomes were assessed with blinded chart reviews, and heart failure outcomes were determined by a blinded adjudication committee. We used negative binomial regression to examine the relationship between medication adherence and outcomes. Results Fifty‐two percent of participants were 52% male, mean age was 61 years, and 31% were of New York Heart Association class III/IV at enrolment; 72% of participants reported full adherence to their heart medicine at baseline. Participants with full medication adherence had a lower rate of all‐cause hospitalisation and death (0·71 events/year) compared with those with any nonadherence (0·86 events/year): adjusted‐for‐site incidence rate ratio was 0·83, fully adjusted incidence rate ratio 0·68. Incidence rate ratios were similar for heart failure hospitalisations. Conclusion A single medication adherence question at baseline predicts hospitalisation and death over one year in heart failure patients. Relevance to clinical practice Medication adherence is associated with all‐cause and heart failure‐related hospitalisation and death in heart failure. It is important for clinicians to assess patients' medication adherence on a regular basis at their clinical follow‐ups.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia‐Rong Wu & Darren A DeWalt & David W Baker & Dean Schillinger & Bernice Ruo & Kristen Bibbins‐Domingo & Aurelia Macabasco‐O'Connell & George M Holmes & Kimberly A Broucksou & Brian Erman & Victoria, 2014. "A single‐item self‐report medication adherence question predicts hospitalisation and death in patients with heart failure," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2554-2564, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:17-18:p:2554-2564
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin, M.H. & Goldman, L., 1997. "Factors contributing to the hospitalization of patients with congestive heart failure," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(4), pages 643-648.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:6326 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnold Chen & Randall Brown & Nancy Archibald & Sherry Aliotta & Peter D. Fox, 2000. "Best Practices in Coordinated Care," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 07ba2bfa4c62447a8a958534d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:3151 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Francesca Casalini & Chiara Seghieri & Michele Emdin & Sabina Nuti, 2017. "Nuovi strumenti di management per la gestione integrata dei percorsi assistenziali dei pazienti cronici," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(102), pages 35-59.
    4. Randall Brown & Sherry Aliotta & Nancy Archibald & Arnold Chen & Deborah Peikes & Jennifer Schore, 2001. "Research Design for the Evaluation of the Medicare Coordinated Care Demonstration," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 39a638a9647d413bb23bb0a2b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. repec:mpr:mprres:2577 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:17-18:p:2554-2564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.