IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i15-16p2355-2366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a diabetes nurse specialist prescribing project

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Wilkinson
  • Jenny Carryer
  • Jeffery Adams

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the diabetes nurse specialist prescribing project with the aim of determining whether diabetes nurse specialist prescribing is safe and effective and to inform the implementation and extension of registered nurse prescribing. Background Registered nurses in many countries are able to prescribe medicines, but in New Zealand, prior to the diabetes nurse specialist project, nurse practitioners were the only nurses who could prescribe medicines. New regulations allowed the nurses to prescribe a limited number of prescription medicines. Design The study was a process and outcome clinical programme evaluation. Methods The project took place between April–September 2011 and involved 12 diabetes nurse specialist in four localities. Quantitative data were collected from clinical records maintained by the diabetes nurse specialist for the project (1274 patients and 3402 prescribing events), from surveys with stakeholders (general practitioners, n = 30; team members, n = 19; and patients, n = 89) and audits from patient notes (n = 117) and prescriptions (n = 227), and qualitative data from interviews with project participants (n = 18) and patients (n = 19). All data were analysed descriptively. Results Diabetes nurse specialist prescribing was determined to be safe, of high quality and appropriate. It brought important benefits to the effectiveness of specialist diabetes services, was acceptable to patients and was supported by the wider healthcare team. Conclusions These findings are consistent with the findings reported in the international literature about nurse prescribing in a range of different practice areas. Clarification of the education and competence requirements and resourcing for the ongoing supervision of nurses is recommended if the prescribing model is to be extended. Relevance to clinical practice Diabetes nurse specialist prescribing improved access to medicines by providing a more timely service. Nurses felt more satisfied with their work because they could independently provide a complete episode of care. As novice prescribers, nurses need to be well prepared educationally and have access to supportive clinical supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Wilkinson & Jenny Carryer & Jeffery Adams, 2014. "Evaluation of a diabetes nurse specialist prescribing project," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2355-2366, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2355-2366
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12517
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanna Hopia & Anne Karhunen & Johanna Heikkilä, 2017. "Growth of nurse prescribing competence: facilitators and barriers during education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3164-3173, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2355-2366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.