IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i15-16p2323-2331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The lived experience of relationships after major burn injury

Author

Listed:
  • Asgjerd L Moi
  • Eva Gjengedal

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and describe the meaning of relationships after major burn injury. Background A major burn injury may represent a threat to preburn appearance and level of functioning. Social resources and interaction are considered important for minimising the negative impacts on life after burn through all phases of care and rehabilitation. Yet, the subjective experiences of relating to others after burns have not been extensively explored. Design The study was performed by using a phenomenological approach. Methods A purposive sample (n = 14) of patients who had experienced major burns were interviewed in average 14 (5–35) months postinjury. The interviews were analysed by the phenomenological method of Giorgi. Results The essence of the experience of relationships was constituted by other people re‐anchoring the burn‐injured persons to preburn life, being confirming of the new self, as well as being sensitive, competent and safeguarding with respect to actual and potential problems and harms. New bodily limitations demanded assistive others. Moreover, a worry about the overall burden on close family was typical. The supportive actions from others were mostly described as positive, but could also be experienced as challenging, and sometimes even unwanted and interfering with the struggle for regained freedom. Conclusions Across variation, an increased awareness of the meaning of mutual interdependence was typical. Supportive relationships with family, friends and health professionals were important for the return to society, preburn activities and a meaningful life. Relevance to clinical practice A perspective that values the significance of social support from family, friends, health professionals and others who are important for the burn‐injured person, and that does not underestimate challenges that may be involved, is recommended during all phases of burn care. Health professionals should also acknowledge the importance of relationships when developing structured educational programmes and organising peer support.

Suggested Citation

  • Asgjerd L Moi & Eva Gjengedal, 2014. "The lived experience of relationships after major burn injury," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2323-2331, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2323-2331
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12514
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2323-2331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.