IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i15-16p2196-2204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of intimate relationships in partners before and after a patient's myocardial infarction

Author

Listed:
  • Eleonor I Fransson
  • Eva Arenhall
  • Elaine E Steinke
  • Bengt Fridlund
  • Ulrica G Nilsson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe and explore how partners rate their intimate relationship before and after the patients' first myocardial infarction. A further aim was to investigate the association between partners' rating of their intimate relationship and self‐rated health. Background To date, information on how partners experience the intimate relationship before and after a patient's myocardial infarction is sparse. Design A descriptive and exploratory design with longitudinal data collection. Methods The study comprised 127 partners, aged 34–87 years. Data collection included self‐reported information on socio‐demographic data, intimate relationship and self‐rated health one year before and one year after patients' first myocardial infarction. Intimate relationship was assessed by the Swedish version of the Relationship Assessment Scale. Self‐rated health was evaluated by the EuroQoL visual analogue scale. Results In general, partners reported high satisfaction with their intimate relationship both before and after the patients' myocardial infarction. Women reported somewhat lower ratings in their intimate relationship than men before the myocardial infarction. Women increased their ratings after one year, while men on average decreased their ratings. Partners with higher education reported lower ratings for intimate relationship after one year. Those with children living at home rated intimate relationship lower than those without children living at home after one year. Partners' self‐rated health status was stable over time. No significant association between intimate relationship and self‐rated health was found. Conclusions This study provides important insights regarding couples' relationships from the perspective of the partner. Socio‐demographic factors such as sex, educational level, having children living at home and employment status may influence how the relationship, from the partners' perspective, is affected by a myocardial infarction event. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides insight into how partners rate their intimate relationship and self‐rated health over time before and after patients' myocardial infarction.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleonor I Fransson & Eva Arenhall & Elaine E Steinke & Bengt Fridlund & Ulrica G Nilsson, 2014. "Perceptions of intimate relationships in partners before and after a patient's myocardial infarction," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2196-2204, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2196-2204
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12492
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Eriksson & Kenneth Asplund & Marianne Svedlund, 2010. "Couples’ thoughts about and expectations of their future life after the patient’s hospital discharge following acute myocardial infarction," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3485-3493, December.
    2. Kulik, James A. & Mahler, Heike I.M., 2006. "Marital quality predicts hospital stay following coronary artery bypass surgery for women but not men," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2031-2040, October.
    3. Waltz, Millard, 1986. "Marital context and post-infarction quality of life: Is it social support or something more?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 791-805, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gail A. Hilbert, 1994. "Cardiac Patients and Spouses," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 3(3), pages 243-252, August.
    2. Sonja Tuomisto & Meeri Koivula & Päivi Åstedt‐Kurki & Mika Helminen, 2018. "Family involvement in rehabilitation: Coronary artery disease—patients' perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3020-3031, August.
    3. Ulla Fredriksson‐Larsson & Pia Alsén & Björn W Karlson & Eva Brink, 2015. "Fatigue two months after myocardial infarction and its relationships with other concurrent symptoms, sleep quality and coping strategies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2192-2200, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2196-2204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.