IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i15-16p2170-2180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disease stigma and its mediating effect on the relationship between symptom severity and quality of life among community‐dwelling women with stress urinary incontinence: a study from a Chinese city

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojuan Wan
  • Cuili Wang
  • Dongjuan Xu
  • Xiaomeng Guan
  • Tao Sun
  • Kefang Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the association between disease stigma and quality of life and whether disease stigma mediates the relationship between symptom severity and quality of life among community‐dwelling women with stress urinary incontinence in China. Background Urinary incontinent patients perceived great stigma, which inhibited from seeking medical help. There is evidence that stigma associated with some other diseases had a complex relationship with illness severity and quality of life. However, little empirical research has examined the role that stigma plays among urinary incontinent population. Design A cross‐sectional, descriptive design was used. Methods A purposive sample of 333 women with stress urinary incontinence from a Chinese city was enrolled. Data were collected on symptom severity, disease stigma and quality of life using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Urinary Incontinence Short Form, Social Impact Scale and Incontinence Quality‐of‐Life Measure, respectively. The mediate effect of disease stigma was analysed using a series of hierarchical regression models. Results Disease stigma negatively correlated with quality of life among stress urinary incontinent women. Social isolation and internalised shame, but not social rejection, the domains of disease stigma, partially mediated the effect of symptom severity on quality of life, attenuating the effect by 34·3% together. Conclusions Disease stigma impairs quality of life of women with stress urinary incontinence and mediates the association between symptom severity and quality of life. Health workers may improve their quality of life by addressing perceived stigma. Relevance to clinical practice Our findings suggest that in clinical practice, stigma reduction may have the potential to not only improve quality of life, but also mitigate the impact of the severity on quality of life among urinary incontinent women. Social isolation and internalised shame should be more concerned in targeted interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojuan Wan & Cuili Wang & Dongjuan Xu & Xiaomeng Guan & Tao Sun & Kefang Wang, 2014. "Disease stigma and its mediating effect on the relationship between symptom severity and quality of life among community‐dwelling women with stress urinary incontinence: a study from a Chinese city," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2170-2180, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2170-2180
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12482
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cuili Wang & Jingjing Li & Xiaojuan Wan & Xiaojuan Wang & Robert L. Kane & Kefang Wang, 2015. "Effects of stigma on Chinese women's attitudes towards seeking treatment for urinary incontinence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 1112-1121, April.
    2. Magdalena Ptak & Agnieszka Brodowska & Sylwester Ciećwież & Iwona Rotter, 2017. "Quality of Life in Women with Stage 1 Stress Urinary Incontinence after Application of Conservative Treatment—A Randomized Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2170-2180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.