IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i15-16p2121-2130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Sun Ju Chang
  • Misoon Song
  • Eun‐Ok Im

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Background Self‐efficacy has been reported to be a key component of enhancing diabetes self‐management, and many healthcare providers have paid attention to the instruments to accurately measure self‐efficacy as related to diabetes self‐management. Design A psychometric test of an instrument measuring self‐efficacy as related to diabetes self‐management. Methods A total of 278 Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes were recruited in one senior centre in Seoul, South Korea. The instrument included the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale and the summary of the Diabetes Self‐care Activities. Item analyses, reliability including internal consistency and stability, and validity including exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and hypothesised relationships test were used to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale. Results The item‐total correlation coefficients of all items were >0·30 and ranged from 0·47–0·73. The coefficient alpha for the internal consistency was 0·89, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the stability was 0·90. Two factors were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis (factor 1, self‐efficacy for diet‐related self‐management behaviours; factor 2, self‐efficacy for diabetes self‐management behaviours except diet), and the two‐factor model for the confirmatory factor analysis had good fitness indices. The diabetes self‐efficacy scores were positively correlated with the level of diabetes self‐management. Conclusions The findings supported that the Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale was reliable and valid in measuring self‐efficacy as related to diabetes self‐management in Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes. Relevance to clinical practice The Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale can allow healthcare providers to effectively measure self‐efficacy related to diabetes self‐management so that they can provide the appropriate and adequate nursing care to Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun Ju Chang & Misoon Song & Eun‐Ok Im, 2014. "Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(15-16), pages 2121-2130, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2121-2130
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12133
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:15-16:p:2121-2130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.