IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i11-12p1736-1750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incidence of pregnancy‐related discomforts and management approaches to relieve them among pregnant women

Author

Listed:
  • Evsen Nazik
  • Gulsen Eryilmaz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To determine the incidence of pregnancy‐related physical symptoms in healthy pregnant women and their management strategies. Background In normal progression of pregnancy, many symptoms were experienced. Pregnancy‐related physical symptoms may have a negative effect on pregnant women's quality of life. However, pregnant women avoid taking medications from the fear that the medication they use may have a harmful effect on the foetus. Therefore, they practise nonpharmacological methods to help them manage their pregnancy‐related physical symptoms. Design This study used a comparative and descriptive design. Methods The study population comprised of pregnant women who were visiting for routine check‐up and/or examination in the obstetrics gynaecology outpatient clinics of three hospitals in Erzurum, Turkey. The data were collected via a questionnaire including socio‐demographic items and questions to identify the pregnancy‐related physical symptoms that they experienced and their management strategies. Results The top three most reported complaints were nausea–vomiting (87·8%), fatigue (77·9%) and breast pain–tenderness (76·2%) during the first trimester, whereas polyuria (79·9%, 88·4%), fatigue (75·6%, 88·4%) and heart burn (71·3%, 81·8%) during the second and third trimesters. Depending on the symptoms, the pregnant women either did nothing or took correct, incorrect or empirical actions to manage their problems. Data revealed that the major source of knowledge was based on their previous experience and that of close relatives. As their education level increased, the percentage of women taking scientifically proven action to correct the problem increased. Conclusions Various physical symptoms were experienced by women in each trimester of pregnancy. The majority of the women did not do anything to alleviate their physical symptoms. Relevance to clinical practice Midwives and nurses should question the strategies used by pregnant women. In this way, the inappropriate and incorrect practices can be determined, and education on the appropriate practices can be provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Evsen Nazik & Gulsen Eryilmaz, 2014. "Incidence of pregnancy‐related discomforts and management approaches to relieve them among pregnant women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1736-1750, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1736-1750
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuria Marín-Jiménez & Milkana Borges-Cosic & Olga Ocón-Hernández & Irene Coll-Risco & Marta Flor-Alemany & Laura Baena-García & José Castro-Piñero & Virginia A. Aparicio, 2021. "Association of Self-Reported Physical Fitness with Pregnancy Related Symptoms the GESTAFIT Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Solmaz Ghanbari-Homaie & Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi & Sonia Hasani & Mojgan Mirghafourvand, 2022. "Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Pregnancy Symptoms Inventory (PSI)," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 960-967, June.
    3. Wan-Ru Wu & Li-Chun Lee & Chin-Hsing Tsai & Pen-Hsin Hou, 2024. "The Relationships Between Multidimensional Symptom Burden, Adaptation, and Depression During Pregnancy: A Cross-sectional Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 33(2-3), pages 157-164, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1736-1750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.