IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i11-12p1653-1661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving success in intervention studies: an analysis of variable staff engagement across three midwifery settings

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Henderson
  • Sue Schoonbeek
  • Christine Ossenberg
  • Alison Caddick
  • Diane Wing
  • Lorna Capell
  • Karen Gould

Abstract

Aims and objectives To critically analyse the success of staff's behaviour changes in the practice setting. Facilitators were employed to initiate and facilitate a four‐step process (optimism, overcoming obstacles, oversight and reinforcing outcomes) that fostered development of behaviours consistent with learning in everyday practice. Background Many studies seek to engage staff in workplace behaviour improvement. The success of such studies is highly variable. Little is known about the work of the facilitator in ensuring success. Understanding the contextual factors that contribute to effective facilitation of workplace improvement is essential to ensure best use of resources. Design Mixed methods Methods Facilitators employed a four‐step process – optimism, overcoming obstacles, oversight and reinforcing outcomes – to stage behaviour change implementation. The analysis of staff engagement in behaviour changes was assessed through weekly observation of workplaces, informal discussions with staff and facilitator diaries. The impact of behaviour change was informed through pre‐ and postsurveys on staff's perception across three midwifery sites. Surveys measured (1) midwives' perception of support for their role in facilitating learning (Support Instrument for Nurses Facilitating the Learning of Others) and (2) development of a learning culture in midwifery practice settings (Clinical Learning Organisational Culture Survey). Midwives across three sites completed the presurvey (n = 216) and postsurvey (n = 90). Results Impact varied according to the degree that facilitators were able to progress teams through four stages necessary for change (OOORO). Statistically significant results were apparent in two subscales important for supporting staff, namely teamwork and acknowledgement; in the two areas, facilitators worked through ‘obstacles’ and coached staff in performing the desired behaviours and rewarded them for their success. Elements of the learning culture also statistically improved in one site. Conclusions Findings suggest behaviour change success is dependent on facilitators to systematically engage staff through all four stages of implementation. Relevance to clinical practice It is important that investment is made to commitment and resources to all four stages before embarking on change processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Henderson & Sue Schoonbeek & Christine Ossenberg & Alison Caddick & Diane Wing & Lorna Capell & Karen Gould, 2014. "Achieving success in intervention studies: an analysis of variable staff engagement across three midwifery settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1653-1661, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1653-1661
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12296
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amanda Jane Henderson & Sue Schoonbeek, 2015. "Commentary on ‘Developing a framework for nursing handover in the emergency department: an individualised and systematic approach’ by Klim et al," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3-4), pages 608-609, February.
    2. Laurie Grealish & Amanda Henderson & Fritz Quero & Roslyn Phillips & May Surawski, 2015. "The significance of ‘facilitator as a change agent’ – organisational learning culture in aged care home settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 961-969, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1653-1661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.