IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i11-12p1541-1551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric validation of Emotional Reaction Instrument‐English to measure American children’s emotional responses to hospitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Jin‐Sun Kim
  • Jeong‐hwan Park
  • Roxie L Foster
  • Abbas Tavakoli

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to test the initial psychometric properties of the Emotional Reactions Instrument‐English with hospitalised American children, ages 7–12 years, in the USA. Background. Children’s negative emotional responses have been a subject of concern for paediatric clinicians and researchers, especially because negative emotional responses following or during hospitalisation are associated with adverse patient outcomes. Existing self‐report paediatric instruments have a number of limitations including lack of clinical feasibility and psychometric evidence. Design. A survey and psychometric approach was used to test initial reliability and validity of the Emotional Reactions Instrument‐English. Methods. Two hundred hospitalised American children, 7–12 years of age, who were admitted to a Children’s Hospital in the USA were recruited for this study. The children were administered the Emotional Reactions Instrument‐English, the Facial Affective Scale, and a demographic form. Results. Internal consistency was supported by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0·83 for the total scale. Alpha coefficients for subscales ranged from 0·59–0·82. Construct validity was tested with exploratory factor analysis. Through principal component analysis, four factors were identified that explained 64% of the variance. Concurrent validity was supported by most items in the Emotional Reactions Instrument‐English being significantly correlated with the Facial Affective Scale (r = 0·18–0·59). The instrument can be administered to hospitalised children in 5–10 minutes. Conclusions. The results of this exploratory study provide initial support for the psychometric adequacy of the Emotional Reactions Instrument‐English with hospitalised American children ages 7–12 years. Further testing of the Emotional Reactions Instrument‐English is required to validate the subscales and evaluate the instrument’s use with children of different ages, race and ethnicity. Relevance to clinical practice. This study introduces a new, clinically feasible instrument to measure children’s diverse emotional responses to hospitalisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin‐Sun Kim & Jeong‐hwan Park & Roxie L Foster & Abbas Tavakoli, 2014. "Psychometric validation of Emotional Reaction Instrument‐English to measure American children’s emotional responses to hospitalisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1541-1551, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1541-1551
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04274.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04274.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04274.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1541-1551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.