IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i11-12p1532-1540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of the Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory (CPLNI) for use in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Luzia E Galdeano
  • Rejane K Furuya
  • Manuel A Rodrigues
  • Rosana AS Dantas
  • Lídia A Rossi

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To perform the semantic validation and to evaluate the reliability and the presence of ceiling and floor effects of the Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory in Portuguese patients with coronary artery disease. Background. Information should be selected based on what patients know and need to learn, which means that the teaching process should be based on each person’s needs. The Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory is aimed at identifying the cardiac patients’ individual learning needs. Design. Methodological research design. Methods. Two hundred patients hospitalised at the coronary intensive care unit or at the cardiothoracic surgery unit of a public hospital in Lisbon answered the adapted version of the Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory. Internal consistency was estimated based on Cronbach’s alpha. Scores above 0·50 were considered acceptable. Stability was measured through test–retest and calculated using student’s t test. Significance was set at 0·05. Results. Patients’ mean age was 65 years (SD = 11·8), and most were men (152; 76%). Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was high in the first and second measurement (0·91), and for seven domains, it was acceptable in the first and second measurement (range from 0·50–0·89). No statistically significant difference was found between mean scores on the first and second measurement. Lower diversity was observed in the answers, most of which ranged between important and very important (ceiling‐effect). Conclusion. The adapted version for use in Portugal maintained the conceptual, semantic and idiomatic equivalences of the original version and showed adequate reliability. Relevance to clinical practices. Owing to the lack of validated instruments translated into Portuguese, to measure cardiac patients’ learning needs, this study entails important clinical and theoretical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Luzia E Galdeano & Rejane K Furuya & Manuel A Rodrigues & Rosana AS Dantas & Lídia A Rossi, 2014. "Reliability of the Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory (CPLNI) for use in Portugal," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1532-1540, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1532-1540
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04158.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04158.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04158.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1532-1540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.