IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i11-12p1520-1531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting the most appropriate inferential statistical test for your quantitative research study

Author

Listed:
  • Josette Bettany‐Saltikov
  • Victoria Jane Whittaker

Abstract

Aims and objectives To discuss the issues and processes relating to the selection of the most appropriate statistical test. A review of the basic research concepts together with a number of clinical scenarios is used to illustrate this. Background Quantitative nursing research generally features the use of empirical data which necessitates the selection of both descriptive and statistical tests. Different types of research questions can be answered by different types of research designs, which in turn need to be matched to a specific statistical test(s). Design Discursive paper. Methods This paper discusses the issues relating to the selection of the most appropriate statistical test and makes some recommendations as to how these might be dealt with. Conclusion When conducting empirical quantitative studies, a number of key issues need to be considered. Considerations for selecting the most appropriate statistical tests are discussed and flow charts provided to facilitate this process. Relevance to clinical practice When nursing clinicians and researchers conduct quantitative research studies, it is crucial that the most appropriate statistical test is selected to enable valid conclusions to be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Josette Bettany‐Saltikov & Victoria Jane Whittaker, 2014. "Selecting the most appropriate inferential statistical test for your quantitative research study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1520-1531, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1520-1531
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:11-12:p:1520-1531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.