IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i1-2p145-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn Gardner
  • Anne Gardner
  • Jane O'Connell

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the safety and quality of nurse practitioner service using the audit framework of Structure, Process and Outcome. Background Health service and workforce reform are on the agenda of governments and other service providers seeking to contain healthcare costs whilst providing safe and effective health care to communities. The nurse practitioner service is one health workforce innovation that has been adopted globally to improve timely access to clinical care, but there is scant literature reporting evaluation of the quality of this service innovation. Design A mixed‐methods design within the Donabedian evaluation framework was used. Methods The Donabedian framework was used to evaluate the Structure, Process and Outcome of nurse practitioner service. A range of data collection approaches was used, including stakeholder survey (n = 36), in‐depth interviews (11 patients and 13 nurse practitioners) and health records data on service processes. Results The study identified that adequate and detailed preparation of Structure and Process is essential for the successful implementation of a service innovation. The multidisciplinary team was accepting of the addition of nurse practitioner service, and nurse practitioner clinical care was shown to be effective, satisfactory and safe from the perspective of the clinician stakeholders and patients. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the Donabedian framework of Structure, Process and Outcome evaluation is a valuable and validated approach to examine the safety and quality of a service innovation. Furthermore, in this study, specific Structure elements were shown to influence the quality of service processes further validating the framework and the interdependence of the Structure, Process and Outcome components. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding the Structure and Process requirements for establishing nursing service innovation lays the foundation for safe, effective and patient‐centred clinical care.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn Gardner & Anne Gardner & Jane O'Connell, 2014. "Using the Donabedian framework to examine the quality and safety of nursing service innovation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1-2), pages 145-155, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:1-2:p:145-155
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12146
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalie Bradford & Shirley Chambers & Adrienne Hudson & Jacqui Jauncey‐Cooke & Robyn Penny & Carol Windsor & Patsy Yates, 2019. "Evaluation frameworks in health services: An integrative review of use, attributes and elements," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2486-2498, July.
    2. Ides Wong & Eryn Wright & Damian Santomauro & Raquel How & Christopher Leary & Meredith Harris, 2018. "Implementing two nurse practitioner models of service at an Australian male prison: A quality assurance study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 287-300, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:1-2:p:145-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.