Author
Listed:
- Olivia Numminen
- Riitta Meretoja
- Hannu Isoaho
- Helena Leino‐Kilpi
Abstract
Aims and objectives To compare nurse competence in terms of its quality and frequency of action in medical, surgical, paediatric/obstetric/gynaecological and psychiatric clinical fields. Background One challenge of current health care is to target practising nurses' competencies to optimal use. Therefore, a systematic assessment of nurse competence is justified. Studies using the Nurse Competence Scale have found that nurses' competence is on a good or very good level and it increases with age and work experience. Design A cross‐sectional comparative survey using the Nurse Competence Scale. Methods A purposive sample of 2083 nurses in a major University Hospital in Finland participated in this study in 2007–2008. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics' anova with Bonferroni correction, and Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients were used to analyse the data. Results The overall level of competence of nurses was good, and the quality of action correlated positively with the frequency of action. Nurses in the psychiatric field reached somewhat higher overall mean scores than nurses in other clinical fields. On item level, nurses seemed to be the most competent in actions related to immediate individualised patient care, the maintenance of their own professional competence and commitment to nursing ethics. Age and particularly work experience were positively correlated with the competence. Conclusion Findings from this large data corroborate previous study results on the category level assessment of nurse competence using the Nurse Competence Scale indicating a good level of competence. On item level, findings revealed more detailed themes of nurse competence, which complements earlier knowledge retrieved from the category level analysis and could be used to target nurses' competencies to even more optimal use. Relevance to clinical practice Competence assessment and targeted interventions are recommended as tools for the management for planning nurses' career development and continuing education to ensure competent and motivated work force and high‐quality care.
Suggested Citation
Olivia Numminen & Riitta Meretoja & Hannu Isoaho & Helena Leino‐Kilpi, 2013.
"Professional competence of practising nurses,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1411-1423, May.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:9-10:p:1411-1423
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04334.x
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Kawoun Seo & Taejeong Jang & Taehui Kim, 2022.
"Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
- Kinga Harpula & Anna Bartosiewicz, 2022.
"Factors Influencing Nurses’ Opinions on the Implementation of Nursing Advice in Poland,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-9, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:9-10:p:1411-1423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.