Author
Listed:
- Inger L Hovind
- Inger S Bredal
- Alfhild Dihle
Abstract
Aims and objectives To gain knowledge of how women experience pain and pain treatment after breast cancer surgery and to identify areas of pain management that they believe could be improved. Background According to the literature, 20–60% of patients develop chronic pain after breast cancer surgery and treatment. Because of the short length of hospitalisation in Norway, breast cancer patients are left responsible for most of their own pain management. Design An explorative and qualitative design was chosen. Methods In‐depth interviews were conducted with eight women who experienced chronic pain rated at 3–5 on a 11‐point numerical rating scale one year or more after breast cancer surgery. This study is part of a larger, quantitative study assessing pain after surgery. The interviews were taped, transcribed and analysed according to qualitative content analysis. Results The interviewees had expected pain in the acute postoperative period, but had not expected that pain would persist. None of the women recalled having received information about pain. They took few analgesics and were generally sceptical about medication, mostly because of earlier reactions to drugs. They received no explanations for and little help with chronic pain. Most of them were active and worked outside the home. Conclusions After short hospital stays, adequate information and follow‐up after discharge may optimise pain management regimens. Those who develop chronic pain need more information and help to manage their pain. Relevance to clinical practice Finding the appropriate time for information about postoperative pain management is necessary to optimise a good analgesic regimen. Multimodal and aggressive treatment of acute pain should be emphasised.
Suggested Citation
Inger L Hovind & Inger S Bredal & Alfhild Dihle, 2013.
"Women's experience of acute and chronic pain following breast cancer surgery,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(7-8), pages 1044-1052, April.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:7-8:p:1044-1052
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12167
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:7-8:p:1044-1052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.