IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i5-6p848-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resuscitation in general medical wards: who decides?

Author

Listed:
  • Freda DeKeyser Ganz
  • Nechama Kaufman
  • Sima Israel
  • Sharon Einav

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To investigate nurse experiences and attitudes regarding resuscitation while focusing on intentional avoidance of action during a futile cardiac arrest. Background. Nurses often lack the legal and clinical authority to make resuscitation decisions; however, in cases where they believe that resuscitation would be futile, they may elect to delay/avoid the initiation of resuscitation as a non‐confrontational method of achieving the desired endpoint, thus essentially transferring the final resuscitation decision from the physician to the nurse. Design and methods. An anonymous questionnaire survey conducted among a convenience sample of 122/142 nurses from five medical wards in two Jerusalem hospitals. Results. Nearly one‐fifth (19/117) of participants reported non‐initiation of a futile resuscitation. Nurses who chose not to initiate futile resuscitations were those who scored higher on the Support Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Questionnaire, those that had previously been consulted by a doctor regarding the initiation of resuscitation and those that expressed a desire to be a part of a multidisciplinary team focused on resuscitation decision‐making. No other variables seemed to affect this outcome. Conclusions. Nurses are often excluded from the resuscitation decision‐making process despite their desire to participate. Delayed initiation/avoidance of resuscitation is being actively practiced by some nurses. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses should be given the opportunity to become an essential component of resuscitation decision‐making to avoid the pre‐emption of medical resuscitation decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Freda DeKeyser Ganz & Nechama Kaufman & Sima Israel & Sharon Einav, 2013. "Resuscitation in general medical wards: who decides?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 848-855, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:848-855
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04240.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04240.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04240.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:5-6:p:848-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.