IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p559-568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Counterfeit medicines in Poland: opinions of primary healthcare physicians, nurses and lay persons

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Binkowska‐Bury
  • Pawel Januszewicz
  • Maja Wolan
  • Marek Sobolewski
  • Martin Krauze
  • Zbigniew E Fijalek

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To gain information concerning disparities in the understanding of the counterfeit medicines phenomenon between healthcare workers and lay persons. Background. Central‐eastern Europe is facing significant challenges in combating a multi‐billion euro, and often lethal, trade in counterfeit medicines. It is a major challenge especially for primary healthcare workers to expand the understanding of counterfeit medicines to the benefit of patients. Design. Use of questionnaires. Two separate questionnaires were distributed, one for healthcare professionals and the other for lay persons. Methods. Conducted between September 2009–May 2010. One thousand and seventy‐eight primary healthcare professionals and 377 lay persons were surveyed. Results. Findings revealed less awareness among healthcare professionals than lay persons about the danger of purchasing illegal medicines or dietary supplements outside pharmacies. Healthcare professionals have lower levels of awareness about the scale of counterfeit medicines as well as threats of counterfeit medicines to health than lay persons. The majority of medical workers do not know the procedure for reporting suspicious medicine and do not warn their patients against purchasing medicine from unknown sources. Conclusions. Primary healthcare workers have less awareness of the scale of the counterfeit medicines phenomenon than lay persons. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses and physician need to become aware of the counterfeit medicines phenomenon. Nurses are well positioned to assume the active role in educating patients about the threat of the presence of counterfeit medicines so as to enhance safety for their patients. However, to accomplish that aim, these findings suggest that healthcare professionals need to become better educated about counterfeit medicines and need to be trained in skills to identify counterfeit medicines.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Binkowska‐Bury & Pawel Januszewicz & Maja Wolan & Marek Sobolewski & Martin Krauze & Zbigniew E Fijalek, 2013. "Counterfeit medicines in Poland: opinions of primary healthcare physicians, nurses and lay persons," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 559-568, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:559-568
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04166.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04166.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04166.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:559-568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.