IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i3-4p368-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Men's experiences of regaining urinary continence following robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative phenomenological study

Author

Listed:
  • Jo Waller
  • Natalie Pattison

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand how men interpret their experiences of regaining continence following robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Background RALP is an innovative surgical technique intended to minimise the risk of long‐term postoperative urinary incontinence in localised prostate cancer. Studies have shown that urinary function and quality of life domains can be adversely affected following RALP; however, the impact on men's lives has been hitherto unreported. Design A qualitative study using hermeneutic phenomenology Methods Face‐to‐face, in‐depth audio‐recorded interviews with seven men (aged 57–71) who had recently undergone RALP and defined themselves as continent of urine. Data were inductively analysed for themes using an adapted version of Diekelmann et al. [1989, The NLN Criteria of Appraisal of Baccalaureate Programs: A Critical Hermeneutic Analysis, 1st edn. National League for Nursing (NLN) Press, New York, NY] framework. Results Men's experiences of regaining continence were situated within a wider network of personal and social relationships, and cultural structures. Themes included ‘what was forecast’, ‘after‐sales service’, ‘new plumbing’, ‘sense of self’. Men adopted a variety of practical coping strategies: preventing incontinence; improving incontinence; and dealing with lack of bladder control. Conclusion The need to regain a sense of control over their lives resulted in all men developing coping mechanisms in order that they could resume their societal roles, which were salient to their personal identity, inferring that men's ability to cope with incontinence after RALP was dependent on factors other than urinary leakage alone. Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge of the potential impact of RALP could help nurses tailor appropriate interventions. Incontinence is individually interpreted and may not be well‐addressed by traditional ‘one‐size fits all’ preoperative programmes or information. Flexible and imaginative options (e.g., activity‐focused interventions; buddy systems; internet programmes; telephone follow‐up) for preoperative and postoperative support and activities for men may improve men's uptake of such services, through specialist nurse or peer support.

Suggested Citation

  • Jo Waller & Natalie Pattison, 2013. "Men's experiences of regaining urinary continence following robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative phenomenological study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 368-378, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:368-378
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12082
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12082?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:3-4:p:368-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.