IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i23-24p3320-3327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cross‐sectional study of the beliefs and attitudes towards menstruation of Chinese undergraduate males and females in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Wing Chi Wong
  • Mei Kuen Li
  • Wai Ying Veronica Chan
  • Yuen Yu Choi
  • Chi Hung Sandra Fong
  • Ka Wah Kara Lam
  • Wun Chi Sham
  • Ping Ping So
  • Kit Wong
  • Kuen Ha Yeung
  • Tsz Yan Yeung

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the beliefs and attitudes towards menstruation of Chinese undergraduates in Hong Kong and to compare those of (1) male and female undergraduates with those of (2) undergraduates studying health‐related vs. nonhealth‐related programmes. Background Menstruation is typically viewed as a forbidden topic or a troublesome experience. These negative beliefs and attitudes result from existing myths and taboos associated with cultural factors and health education levels. Design A cross‐sectional survey was conducted in all universities in Hong Kong. Undergraduates were invited through convenience sampling to complete a questionnaire assessing their attitudes and beliefs towards menstruation. Methods A questionnaire on ‘beliefs about and attitudes towards menstruation’ was adopted. Questionnaires were self‐administered by the respondents. Results A total of 450 questionnaires were distributed, and a response rate of 96·6% was obtained; 416 completed questionnaires were collected and analysed. Many Chinese undergraduates agreed that menstruation is annoying, causes disability, involves prescription and proscription and is not pleasant. When comparing the beliefs and attitudes towards menstruation of Chinese male undergraduates with those of female undergraduates, females tended to disagree that menstruation should be maintained secret, but tended to agree that it was annoying. When comparing the beliefs and attitudes towards menstruation of Chinese undergraduates studying health‐related programmes with those under nonhealth‐related programmes, the latter group exhibited a higher level of belief in prescription and proscription for menstruation than the former group. Conclusion Chinese undergraduates in Hong Kong were influenced by the traditional Chinese culture and social environment, resulting in negative attitudes towards menstruation. This study recommends that sex education, especially reproductive health education, be extended to tertiary education. Relevance to clinical practice This study provides relevant information on planning the content of sex education or reproductive health education for Chinese undergraduates.

Suggested Citation

  • Wing Chi Wong & Mei Kuen Li & Wai Ying Veronica Chan & Yuen Yu Choi & Chi Hung Sandra Fong & Ka Wah Kara Lam & Wun Chi Sham & Ping Ping So & Kit Wong & Kuen Ha Yeung & Tsz Yan Yeung, 2013. "A cross‐sectional study of the beliefs and attitudes towards menstruation of Chinese undergraduate males and females in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(23-24), pages 3320-3327, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3320-3327
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Herdís Sveinsdóttir, 2018. "Menstruation, objectification and health‐related quality of life: A questionnaire study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 503-513, February.
    2. Jing Jing Su & Deborah Lindell, 2016. "Promoting the menstrual health of adolescent girls in China," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 481-487, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:23-24:p:3320-3327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.